Ida Lillehagen

• Lillehagen, Ida; Heggen, Kristin; Tomson, Göran & Engebretsen, Eivind (2020). Implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals: How Is Health Framed in the Norwegian and Swedish Voluntary National Review Reports? International Journal of Health Policy and Management. ISSN 2322-5939. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.221.
• Lillehagen, Ida; Andersen, Marit Helen; Urstad, Kristin Hjorthaug; Wahl, Astrid Klopstad & Engebretsen, Eivind (2018). How does a new patient education programme for renal recipients become situated and adapted when implemented in the daily teaching practice in a university hospital? An ethnographic observation study. BMJ Open. ISSN 2044-6055. 8:023005(11), p. 1–712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023005. Full text in Research Archive
• Lillehagen, Ida; Heggen, Kristin & Engebretsen, Eivind (2016). Unpacking knowledge translation in participatory research: a micro-level study. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. ISSN 1355-8196. 21(4), p. 217–222. doi: 10.1177/1355819616635683. Show summary

  OBJECTIVES: Funding bodies, policy makers, researchers and clinicians are seeking strategies to increase the translation of knowledge between research and practice. Participatory research encompasses a range of approaches for clinicians' involvement in research in the hope of increasing the relevance and usability of research. Our aim was to explore how knowledge is translated and integrated in participants' presentations and negotiations about knowledge. METHODS: Twelve collaboration meetings were observed, and discussions between researchers and clinicians were recorded. The material was examined using the following analytical terms: knowledge object, knowledge form, knowledge position and knowledge tasks. RESULTS: We identified a recurring rhetorical pattern in translational processes that we call 'relevance testing': a strategy by which the participants attempt to create coherence and identify relevance across different contexts. The limitation of this translational strategy was a tendency to reinforce a 'two-communities' logic: re-establishing the separated worlds and rationales between clinicians and researchers. The 'translational work' that unfolds during discussions remains implicit. It may be that participants are unable to explicitly address and identify the knowledge translation processes because they lack necessary conceptual tools. CONCLUSIONS: Our results contribute to increased awareness about translational processes and provide a language through which barriers to translation can be addressed.

• Lillehagen, Ida; Vøllestad, Nina Køpke; Heggen, Kristin & Engebretsen, Eivind (2013). Protocol for a qualitative study of knowledge translation in a participatory research project. BMJ Open. ISSN 2044-6055. 3(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003328.

View all works in Cristin