Due to copyright issues, an electronic copy of the thesis must be ordered from the faculty. For the faculty to have time to process the order, the order must be received by the faculty at the latest 2 days before the public defence. Orders received later than 2 days before the defence will not be processed. After the public defence, please address any inquiries regarding the thesis to the candidate.
Trial Lecture – time and place
See Trial Lecture.
Adjudication committee
- First opponent: Associate Professor Kristine Pape, Norwegian University of Science and Technology,
- Second opponent: Medical Doctor Mathilde Chevignard, Hôpitaux de Saint Maurice,
- Third member and chair of the evaluation committee: Associate Professor Knut Magne Augestad, University of Oslo
Chair of the Defence
Professor II John Anker Zwart, University of Oslo
Principal Supervisor
MD, PhD Torgeir Hellstrøm, Oslo University Hospital
Summary
Traumatic injuries are a common cause of disability. Few studies examined the functioning of the overall group that sustained moderate-to-severe injuries. It is also unclear if patient’s needs for rehabilitation after injury are met with sufficient services.
This thesis aimed to assess the patients’ functioning and the frequency of unmet rehabilitation needs within the first year following moderate and severe traumatic injury.
Patients from two trauma centres in Norway – Oslo University Hospital and the University Hospital of North Norway, were included in a study and followed the first year after injury. The injury severity was assessed by the New Injury Severity Score.
After one year, half of the patients still experienced disabilities. Patients with known pre-injury diseases and those who sustained a higher number of injuries had an increased risk of lower functioning both 6 and 12 months after the injury. On the contrary - the group of patients that sustained a severe injury to the chest had a better functioning at these follow-ups.
Many patients were found to have unmet rehabilitation needs in the post-acute phase where they had returned to their community. At 6 months 2/3 of patients had unmet needs. Most often, this was caused by inadequate provision of rehabilitation services – e.g. not enough rehabilitation disciplines or to low intensity, including inadequate vocational rehabilitation and social- and family support.
After one year, a substantial proportion of patients still had unmet needs for such services. At 6 months there was a higher risk of unmet rehabilitation needs for patients living in less central areas and for patients with profound injury severity or severe head injury. One year after the injury, patients at younger age or with more pre-injury diseases had more unmet needs for rehabilitation. To conclude, there is a critical need to enhance the rehabilitation services for patients in the first year after moderate and severe traumatic injuries.
Additional information
Contact the research support staff.