Michal Filip Kaminski

• Klimkowski, Robert; Krzyzkowiak, Jakub; Pilonis, Nastazja Dagny; Bujko, Krzysztof & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2024). Endoscopic resection of residual rectal neoplasia after definitive chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Baillière's Best Practice & Research : Clinical Gastroenterology. ISSN 1521-6918. 68. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101896.
• Glinska, Patrycja; Komerska, Katarzyna; Janik, Beata; Olkowicz, Julia; Jedrzejewska, Ilona & Macios, Anna [Show all 10 contributors for this article] (2023). HPV testing in Polish population-based cervical cancer screening programme (HIPPO project)—study protocol of a randomised healthcare policy trial. BMC Cancer. ISSN 1471-2407. 23(1). doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11597-5.
• Chaber‑Ciopinska, Anna; Kiprian, Dorota; Wieszczy, Paulina; Bielasik, Andrzej; Bugajski, Marek & Januszewicz, Wladyslaw [Show all 12 contributors for this article] (2023). Narrow‑band imaging vs Lugol chromoendoscopy in screening for esophageal squamous cell neoplasia: a randomized trial. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine. ISSN 0032-3772. 133(10). doi: 10.20452/pamw.16462.
• Bretthauer, Michael; Wieszczy, Paulina; Løberg, Magnus; Kamiński, Michał Filip; Werner, Tarjei Fiskergård & Helsingen, Lise Mørkved [Show all 10 contributors for this article] (2023). Estimated Lifetime Gained with Cancer Screening Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Internal Medicine. ISSN 2168-6106. 183(11), p. 1196–1203. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3798.
• Zhang, Li; Mosquera, Isabel; Lucas, Eric; Rol, Mary Luz; Carvalho, Andre L. & Basu, Partha [Show all 250 contributors for this article] (2023). CanScreen5, a global repository for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programs. Nature Medicine. ISSN 1078-8956. 29(5), p. 1135–1145. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02315-6.
• Messmann, Helmut; Bisschops, Raf; Antonelli, Giulio; Libânio, Diogo; Sinonquel, Pieter & Abdelrahim, Mohamed [Show all 33 contributors for this article] (2022). Expected value of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 54(12), p. 1211–1231. doi: 10.1055/a-1950-5694.
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad; Nesbakken, Philip Eugen; Løberg, Magnus; Wieszczy, Paulina & Cubiella, Joaquín [Show all 19 contributors for this article] (2022). Rates of repeated colonoscopies to clean the colon from low-risk and high-risk adenomas: Results from the EPoS trials. Gut. ISSN 0017-5749. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327696. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Objective High-quality colonoscopy (adequate bowel preparation, whole-colon visualisation and removal of all neoplastic polyps) is a prerequisite to start polyp surveillance, and is ideally achieved in one colonoscopy. In a large multinational polyp surveillance trial, we aimed to investigate clinical practice variation in number of colonoscopies needed to enrol patients with low-risk and high-risk adenomas in polyp surveillance. Design We retrieved data of all patients with low-risk adenomas (one or two tubular adenomas <10 mm with low-grade dysplasia) and high-risk adenomas (3–10 adenomas, ≥1 adenoma ≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia or villous components) in the European Polyp Surveillance trials fulfilling certain logistic and methodologic criteria. We analysed variations in number of colonoscopies needed to achieve high-quality colonoscopy and enter polyp surveillance by endoscopy centre, and by endoscopists who enrolled ≥30 patients. Results The study comprised 15 581 patients from 38 endoscopy centres in five European countries; 6794 patients had low-risk and 8787 had high-risk adenomas. 961 patients (6.2%, 95% CI 5.8% to 6.6%) underwent two or more colonoscopies before surveillance began; 101 (1.5%, 95% CI 1.2% to 1.8%) in the low-risk group and 860 (9.8%, 95% CI 9.2% to 10.4%) in the high-risk group. Main reasons were poor bowel preparation (21.3%) or incomplete colonoscopy/polypectomy (14.4%) or planned second procedure (27.8%). Need of repeat colonoscopy varied between study centres ranging from 0% to 11.8% in low-risk adenoma patients and from 0% to 63.9% in high-risk adenoma patients. On the second colonoscopy, the two most common reasons for a repeat (third) colonoscopy were piecemeal resection (26.5%) and unspecified reason (23.9%). Conclusion There is considerable practice variation in the number of colonoscopies performed to achieve complete polyp removal, indicating need for targeted quality improvement to reduce patient burden. Trial registration number NCT02319928.

• Dekker, Evelien; Nass, Karlijn J.; Iacucci, Marietta; Murino, Alberto; Sabino, João & Bugajski, Marek [Show all 22 contributors for this article] (2022). Performance measures for colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 54(9), p. 904–915. doi: 10.1055/a-1874-0946.
• Bretthauer, Michael; Løberg, Magnus; Wieszczy, Paulina; Kalager, Mette; Emilsson, Louise & Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad [Show all 21 contributors for this article] (2022). Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death. New England Journal of Medicine. ISSN 0028-4793. 387(17), p. 1547–1556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208375. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Background: Although colonoscopy is widely used as a screening test to detect colorectal cancer, its effect on the risks of colorectal cancer and related death is unclear. Methods: We performed a pragmatic, randomized trial involving presumptively healthy men and women 55 to 64 years of age drawn from population registries in Poland, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands between 2009 and 2014. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to either receive an invitation to undergo a single screening colonoscopy (the invited group) or to receive no invitation or screening (the usual-care group). The primary end points were the risks of colorectal cancer and related death, and the secondary end point was death from any cause. Results: Follow-up data were available for 84,585 participants in Poland, Norway, and Sweden - 28,220 in the invited group, 11,843 of whom (42.0%) underwent screening, and 56,365 in the usual-care group. A total of 15 participants had major bleeding after polyp removal. No perforations or screening-related deaths occurred within 30 days after colonoscopy. During a median follow-up of 10 years, 259 cases of colorectal cancer were diagnosed in the invited group as compared with 622 cases in the usual-care group. In intention-to-screen analyses, the risk of colorectal cancer at 10 years was 0.98% in the invited group and 1.20% in the usual-care group, a risk reduction of 18% (risk ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 0.93). The risk of death from colorectal cancer was 0.28% in the invited group and 0.31% in the usual-care group (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.16). The number needed to invite to undergo screening to prevent one case of colorectal cancer was 455 (95% CI, 270 to 1429). The risk of death from any cause was 11.03% in the invited group and 11.04% in the usual-care group (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.04). Conclusions: In this randomized trial, the risk of colorectal cancer at 10 years was lower among participants who were invited to undergo screening colonoscopy than among those who were assigned to no screening. (Funded by the Research Council of Norway and others; NordICC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00883792.).

• Rodríguez De Santiago, Enrique; Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario; Pohl, Heiko; Agrawal, Deepak; Arvanitakis, Marianna & Baddeley, Robin [Show all 33 contributors for this article] (2022). Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 54(8), p. 797–826. doi: 10.1055/a-1859-3726.
• Areia, Miguel; Mori, Yuichi; Correale, Loredana; Repici, Alessandro; Bretthauer, Michael & Sharma, Prateek [Show all 18 contributors for this article] (2022). Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study. The Lancet Digital Health. ISSN 2589-7500. 4(6), p. e436–e444. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00042-5. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Background Artificial intelligence (AI) tools increase detection of precancerous polyps during colonoscopy and might contribute to long-term colorectal cancer prevention. The aim of the study was to investigate the incremental effect of the implementation of AI detection tools in screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, and the cost-effectiveness of such tools. Methods We conducted Markov model microsimulation of using colonoscopy with and without AI for colorectal cancer screening for individuals at average risk (no personal or family history of colorectal cancer, adenomas, inflammatory bowel disease, or hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome). We ran the microsimulation in a hypothetical cohort of 100 000 individuals in the USA aged 50–100 years. The primary analysis investigated screening colonoscopy with versus without AI every 10 years starting at age 50 years and finishing at age 80 years, with follow-up until age 100 years, assuming 60% screening population uptake. In secondary analyses, we modelled once-in-life screening colonoscopy at age 65 years in adults aged 50–79 years at average risk for colorectal cancer. Post-polypectomy surveillance followed the simplified current guideline. Costs of AI tools and cost for downstream treatment of screening detected disease were estimated with 3% annual discount rates. The main outcome measures included the incremental effect of AI-assisted colonoscopy versus standard (no-AI) colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, and cost-effectiveness of screening projected for the average risk screening US population. Findings In the primary analyses, compared with no screening, the relative reduction of colorectal cancer incidence with screening colonoscopy without AI tools was 44·2% and with screening colonoscopy with AI tools was 48·9% (4·8% incremental gain). Compared with no screening, the relative reduction in colorectal cancer mortality with screening colonoscopy with no AI was 48·7% and with screening colonoscopy with AI was 52·3% (3·6% incremental gain). AI detection tools decreased the discounted costs per screened individual from $3400 to $3343 (a saving of $57 per individual). Results were similar in the secondary analyses modelling once-in-life colonoscopy. At the US population level, the implementation of AI detection during screening colonoscopy resulted in yearly additional prevention of 7194 colorectal cancer cases and 2089 related deaths, and a yearly saving of US$290 million. Interpretation Our findings suggest that implementation of AI detection tools in screening colonoscopy is a cost-saving strategy to further prevent colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Funding European Commission and Japan Society of Promotion of Science.

• Wieszczy, Paulina; Bugajski, Marek; Januszewicz, Wladyslaw; Rupinska, Maria; Szlak, Jakub & Pisera, Malgorzata [Show all 12 contributors for this article] (2022). Comparison of Quality Measures for Detection of Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. ISSN 1542-3565. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.03.023.
• Spychalski, Piotr; Kobiela, Jarek; Wieszczy, Paulina; Bugajski, Marek; Reguła, Jaroslaw & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2022). Adenoma to colorectal cancer estimated transition rates stratified by BMI categories—A cross-sectional analysis of asymptomatic individuals from screening colonoscopy program. Cancers. ISSN 2072-6694. 14(1). doi: 10.3390/cancers14010062.
• Taveira, Filipe; Hassan, Cesare; Kamiński, Michał Filip; Ponchon, Thierry; Benamouzig, Robert & Bugajski, Marek [Show all 24 contributors for this article] (2022). The Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale (CEBuS): A two-phase evaluation study. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 54(1), p. 45–51. doi: 10.1055/a-1331-4325.
• Desai, Madhav; Lieberman, David; Srinivasan, Sachin; Nutalapati, Venkat; Challa, Abhishek & Kalgotra, Pankush [Show all 11 contributors for this article] (2022). Post-endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: A systematic review and proposal for definitions and performance measures in endoscopy. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. doi: 10.1055/a-1729-8066.
• Pedersen, Ina Borgenheim; Rawa-Goleblewska, Anna; Calderwood, Audrey H.; Brix, Lone D.; Grode, Louise B. & Botteri, Edoardo [Show all 17 contributors for this article] (2022). Complete Polyp Resection with Cold versus Hot snare Polypectomy for Polyps sized 4-9 mm: A randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 54(10), p. 961–969. doi: 10.1055/a-1734-7952. Show summary

  Background: Endoscopic screening with polypectomy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). Incomplete polyp removal may attenuate the effect of screening. This randomized trial compared cold snare polypectomy (CSP) with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) in terms of complete polyp resection. Methods: We included patients ≥ 40 years of age at eight hospitals in four countries who had at least one non-pedunculated polyp of 4-9 mm detected at colonoscopy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to CSP or HSP. Biopsies from the resection margins were obtained systematically after polypectomy in both groups. We hypothesized that CSP would be non-inferior to HSP, with a non-inferiority margin of 5 %. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify the factors explaining incomplete resection. Results: 425 patients, with 601 polyps, randomized to either CSP or HSP were included in the analysis. Of 318 polyps removed by CSP and 283 polyps removed by HSP, 34 (10.7 %) and 21 (7.4 %) were incompletely resected, respectively, with an adjusted risk difference of 3.2 % (95 %CI -1.4 % to 7.8 %). There was no difference between the groups in terms of post-polypectomy bleeding, perforation, or abdominal pain. Independent risk factors for incomplete removal were serrated histology (odds ratio [OR] 3.96; 95 %CI 1.63 to 9.66) and hyperplastic histology (OR 2.52; 95 %CI 1.30 to 4.86) in adjusted analyses. Conclusion: In this randomized trial, non-inferiority for CSP could not be demonstrated. Polyps with serrated histology are more prone to incomplete resection compared with adenomas. CSP can be used safely for small polyps in routine colonoscopy practice.

• Wieszczy, Paulina; Waldmann, Elisabeth; Løberg, Magnus; Regula, Jaroslaw; Rupinski, Maciej & Bugajski, Marek [Show all 11 contributors for this article] (2021). Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies. Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. 160(4), p. 1067–1074.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.009.
• Pilonis, Nastazja Dagny; Bugajski, Marek; Wieszczy, Paulina; Rupinski, Maciej; Pisera, Malgorzata & Pawlak, Edyta [Show all 8 contributors for this article] (2021). Participation in Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Health Services Study (PICCOLINO Study). Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. 160(4), p. 1097–1105. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.049.
• Krzeczewski, Bartlomiej; Hassan, Cesare; Krzeczewska, Olga; Wieszczy, Paulina; Pisera, Malgorzata & Ciopinska-Chaber, Anna [Show all 11 contributors for this article] (2021). Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in an organized screening program. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine. ISSN 0032-3772. 131(2), p. 128–135. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15779.
• Macios, Anna; Didkowska, Joanna; Wojciechowska, Urszula; Komerska, Katarzyna; Glińska, Patrycja & Kamiński, Michał Filip [Show all 7 contributors for this article] (2021). Risk factors of cervical cancer after a negative cytological diagnosis in Polish cervical cancer screening programme. Cancer Medicine. ISSN 2045-7634. 10(10), p. 3449–3460. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3857.
• Januszewicz, Władysław; Witczak, Klaudiusz; Wieszczy, Paulina; Socha, Magda; Turkot, Maryla & Wojciechowska, Urszula [Show all 9 contributors for this article] (2021). Prevalence and risk factors of upper gastrointestinal cancers missed during endoscopy: A nationwide registry-based study. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. doi: 10.1055/a-1675-4136.
• Budnicka, Aleksandra; Januszewicz, Władysław; Białek, Andrzej B.; Spychalski, Michal; Regula, Jaroslaw & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2021). Peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of zenker’s diverticulum: A retrospective multicenter study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. ISSN 2077-0383. 10(2), p. 1–8. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020187.
• Wieszczy, Paulina; Kaminski, Michal F; Løberg, Magnus; Bugajski, Marek; Bretthauer, Michael & Kalager, Mette (2021). Estimation of overdiagnosis in colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood testing: Comparison of simulation models. BMJ Open. ISSN 2044-6055. 11(4), p. 1–10. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042158.
• Kobiela, Jarek; Spychalski, Piotr; Wieszczy, Paulina; Pisera, Malgorzata; Pilonis, Nastazja & Rupinski, Maciej [Show all 9 contributors for this article] (2020). Mortality and Rate of Hospitalization in a Colonoscopy Screening Program From a Randomized Health Services Study. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. ISSN 1542-3565. 18(7), p. 1501–1508.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.010.
• Pilonis, Nastazja Dagny; Bugajski, Marek; Wieszczy, Paulina; Franczyk, Robert; Didkowska, Joanna & Wojciechowska, Urszula [Show all 10 contributors for this article] (2020). Long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after a single negative screening colonoscopy. Annals of Internal Medicine. ISSN 0003-4819. 173(2), p. 81–91. doi: 10.7326/M19-2477.
• Zimmermann-Fraedrich, Katharina; Pohl, Heiko; Rösch, Thomas; Rex, Douglas; Hassan, Cecare & Dekker, Evelien [Show all 12 contributors for this article] (2020). Designs of colonoscopic adenoma detection trials: more positive results with tandem than with parallel studies - an analysis of studies on imaging techniques and mechanical devices . Gut. ISSN 0017-5749. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320984.
• Spadaccini, Marco; Frazzoni, Leonardo; Vanella, Giuseppe; East, James; Radaelli, Franco & Spada, Cristiano [Show all 27 contributors for this article] (2020). Efficacy and tolerability of high- vs low-volume split-dose bowel cleansing regimens for colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. ISSN 1542-3565. 18(7), p. 1454–1465. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.044.
• Kamiński, Michał Filip; Robertson, Douglas; Senore, Carlo & Rex, Douglas (2020). Optimizing the Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening Worldwide. Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. 158(2), p. 404–417. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.026.
• Nowakowski, Andrzej; Arbyn, Marc; Turkot, Maryla; Wieszczy, Paulina; Milosz, Kinga & Kamiński, Michał Filip [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2020). A roadmap for a comprehensive control of cervical cancer in Poland integration of available solutions into current practice in primary and secondary prevention. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. ISSN 0959-8278. 29(2), p. 157–164. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000528.
• Wieszczy, Paulina; Kamiński, Michał Filip; Franczyk, Robert; Løberg, Magnus; Kobiela, Jarek & Rupinska, Maria [Show all 15 contributors for this article] (2019). Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Removal of Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. 158(4), p. 875–883. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.011.
• Januszewicz, Władysław; Wieszczy, Paulina; Bialek, Andrzej; Karpińska-Kaczmarczyk, Katarzyna; Szlak, Jakub & Szymonik, Jakub [Show all 10 contributors for this article] (2019). Endoscopist biopsy rate as a quality indicator for outpatient gastroscopy: a multicenter cohort study with validation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ISSN 0016-5107. 89(6), p. 1141–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.008.
• Hassan, Cesare; East, James; Radaelli, Franco; Spada, Cristiano; Benamouzig, Robert & Bisschops, Raf [Show all 22 contributors for this article] (2019). Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2019. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 51(8), p. 775–794. doi: 10.1055/a-0959-0505.
• Vuik, Fanny ER; Nieuwenburg, Stella AV; Bardou, Marc; Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris; Dinis-Ribeiro, Mário & Bento, Maria Jose [Show all 16 contributors for this article] (2019). Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults in Europe over the last 25 years. Gut. ISSN 0017-5749. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317592.
• Bugajski, Marek; Rupinski, MacIej; Wieszczy, Paulina; Pisera, Malgorzata; Régula, Jarosław & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2019). Key performance measures for colonoscopy in the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 51(9), p. 858–865. doi: 10.1055/a-0956-1889.
• van Leerdam, Monique E.; Roos, Victorine H.; van Hooft, Jeanin E.; Balaguer, Francesc; Dekker, Evelien & Kamiński, Michał Filip [Show all 15 contributors for this article] (2019). Endoscopic management of Lynch syndrome and of familial risk of colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 51(11), p. 1082–1093. doi: 10.1055/a-1016-4977.
• Bisschops, Raf; East, James E; Hassan, Cesare; Hazewinkel, Yark; Kamiński, Michał Filip & Neumann, Helmut [Show all 19 contributors for this article] (2019). Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 51(12), p. 1155–1179. doi: 10.1055/a-1031-7657.
• Pisera, Malgorzata; Franczyk, Robert; Wieszczy, Paulina; Polkowski, Marcin; Rupinski, MacIej & Chaber-Ciopinska, Anna [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2019). The impact of low- versus standard-volume bowel preparation on participation in primary screening colonoscopy: A randomized health services study. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 51(3), p. 227–236. doi: 10.1055/a-0748-5479.
• van Leerdam, Monique E.; Roos, Victorine H.; van Hooft, Jeanin E.; Dekker, Evelien; Jover, Rodrigo & Kamiński, Michał Filip [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2019). Endoscopic management of polyposis syndromes: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 51(9), p. 877–895. doi: 10.1055/a-0965-0605.
• Spychalski, Piotr; Kobiela, Jarek; Wieszczy, Paulina; Kamiński, Michał Filip & Régula, Jarosław (2019). Clinical stages of colorectal cancer diagnosed in obese and overweight individuals in the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program. United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal). ISSN 2050-6406. 7(6), p. 790–797. doi: 10.1177/2050640619840451.
• Spada, Cristiano; McNamara, Deirdre; Despott, Edward J.; Adler, Samuel; Cash, Brooks D. & Fernández-Urién, Ignacio [Show all 24 contributors for this article] (2019). Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal). ISSN 2050-6406. 7(5), p. 614–641. doi: 10.1177/2050640619850365.
• Spada, Cristiano; McNamara, Deirdre; Despott, Edward J.; Adler, Samuel; Cash, Brooks D. & Fernández-Urién, Ignacio [Show all 24 contributors for this article] (2019). Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 51(6), p. 574–598. doi: 10.1055/a-0889-9586.
• Bugajski, M; Wieszczy, P; Rupinski, M; Hoff, Geir; Huppertz-Hauss, Gert & Regula, J [Show all 8 contributors for this article] (2019). Effectiveness of digital feedback on patient experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy: a randomized Health services study. Endoscopy International Open. ISSN 2196-9736. 7(4), p. E537–E544. doi: 10.1055/a-0830-4648.
• Valori, Roland; Cortas, George; de Lange, Thomas; Salem Balfaqih, Omer; de Pater, Marjon & Eisendrath, Pierre [Show all 25 contributors for this article] (2019). Performance measures for endoscopy services: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal). ISSN 2050-6406. 7(1), p. 21–44. doi: 10.1177/2050640618810242.
• Valori, Roland; Cortas, George; de Lange, Thomas; Balfaqih, Omer Salem; de Pater, Marjon & Eisendrath, Pierre [Show all 25 contributors for this article] (2018). Performance measures for endoscopy services: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 50(12), p. 1186–1204. doi: 10.1055/a-0755-7515.
• Domagk, Dirk; Oppong, Kofi W.; Aabakken, Lars; Czakó, László; Gyökeres, Tibor & Manes, Gianpiero [Show all 23 contributors for this article] (2018). Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal). ISSN 2050-6406. 6(10), p. 1448–1460. doi: 10.1177/2050640618808157.
• Kamiński, Michał Filip & Bugajski, Marek (2018). Sigmoidoscopy: a shortcut to effective screening or a dead end? The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology. ISSN 2468-1253. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30410-2.
• Kamiński, Michał Filip; Hassan, C.; Senore, C; Cassoni, Paola; Baron, John A. & Rex, DK [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2018). Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.050.
• Rutter, Matthew D.; Kamiński, Michał Filip; Valori, R; Corley, Douglas; dekker, E & Forsberg, A [Show all 16 contributors for this article] (2018). World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. 155(3), p. 909–925. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.038.
• Kamiński, Michał Filip & Anna, Rawa-Golebiewska (2018). Colonoscopy quality: continuous improvement towards perfection. Endoscopy International Open. ISSN 2196-9736. 6(11), p. E1310–E1311. doi: 10.1055/a-0732-5216..
• Kalager, Mette; Wieszczy, Paulina; Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I; Corley, Douglas; Bretthauer, Michael & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2018). Overdiagnosis in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Time to Acknowledge a Blind Spot. Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. 155(3), p. 592–595. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.037.
• Domagk, Dirk; Oppong, Kofi W.; Aabakken, Lars; Czakó, László; Gyökeres, Tibor & Manes, Gianpiero [Show all 23 contributors for this article] (2018). Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 50(11), p. 1116–1127. doi: 10.1055/a-0749-8767.
• Turkot, Maryla; Mokwa, Dagmara; Wieszczy, Paulina; Spych, Katarzyna; Kurowska, Natalia & Nowakowski, Andrzej [Show all 7 contributors for this article] (2018). External audit of providers of the cervical cancer prevention programme in Poland in 2016/2017. Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology. ISSN 0029-540X. 68(2), p. 65–76. doi: 10.5603/NJO.2018.0011.
• Januszewicz, Władysław; Kamiński, Michał Filip; Wieszczy, Paulina; Wrońska, Ewa; Bielasik, Andrzej & Wojciechowska, Urszula [Show all 9 contributors for this article] (2017). Adenocarcinoma risk in patients registered with Polish Barrett's Oesophagus Registry. Diseases of the esophagus. ISSN 1120-8694. 30(1), p. 1–6. doi: 10.1111/dote.12483.
• Wieszczy, Paulina; Regula, Jaroslaw & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2017). Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer. Baillière's Best Practice & Research : Clinical Gastroenterology. ISSN 1521-6918. 31(4), p. 441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.07.002.
• Kamiński, Michał Filip; Wieszczy, Paulina; Rupinski, Maciej; Wojciechowska, Urszula; Didkowska, Joanna & Kraszewska, Ewa [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2017). Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. 153(1), p. 98–105. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.006.
• Ijspeert, Joep Evert Godfried; Bevan, Roisin; Senore, Carlo; Kaminski, Michal Filip; Kuipers, Ernst Johan & Mróz, Andrzej [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2017). Detection rate of serrated polyps and serrated polyposis syndrome in colorectal cancer screening cohorts: A European overview. Gut. ISSN 0017-5749. 66(7), p. 1225–1232. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310784.
• Bugajski, Marek; Wieszczy, Paulina; Hoff, Geir; Rupinski, Maciej; Regula, Jaroslaw & Kaminski, Michal Filip (2017). Modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after screening colonoscopy. Gut. ISSN 0017-5749. 67(11), p. 1958–1964. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313905.
• Kaminski, Michal Filip; Thomas-Gibson, Siwan; Bugajski, Marek; Bretthauer, Michael; Rees, Colin J. & Dekker, Evelien [Show all 29 contributors for this article] (2017). Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal). ISSN 2050-6406. 5(3), p. 309–334. doi: 10.1177/2050640617700014.
• Kaminski, Michal Filip; Thomas-Gibson, Siwan; Bugajski, Marek; Bretthauer, Michael; Rees, Colin J. & Dekker, Evelien [Show all 29 contributors for this article] (2017). Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 49(4), p. 378–397. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-103411.
• Chaber-Ciopinska, A.; Kiprian, Dorota; Kawecki, Andrzei & Kaminski, Michal Filip (2016). Surveillance of patients at high-risk of squamous cell esophageal cancer. Baillière's Best Practice & Research : Clinical Gastroenterology. ISSN 1521-6918. 30(6), p. 893–900. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.003.
• Bretthauer, Michael; Aabakken, Lars; Dekker, Evelien; Kaminski, Michal Filip; Rösch, Thomas & Hultcrantz, Rolf [Show all 15 contributors for this article] (2016). Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy position statement. United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal). ISSN 2050-6406. 4(2), p. 172–176. doi: 10.1177/2050640616629079.
• Rees, Colin J.; Ngu, Wee Sing; Regula, Jaroslaw; Bisschops, Raf; Saftoiu, Adrian & Dekker, Evelien [Show all 24 contributors for this article] (2016). European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Establishing the key unanswered research questions within gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 48(10), p. 884–891. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-110398.
• Bisschops, Raf; Areia, Miguel; Coron, Emmanuel; Dobru, Daniela; Kaskas, Bernd & Kuvaev, Roman [Show all 19 contributors for this article] (2016). Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal). ISSN 2050-6406. 4(5), p. 629–656. doi: 10.1177/2050640616664843.
• Bisschops, Raf; Areia, Miguel; Coron, Emmanuel; Dobru, Daniela; Kaskas, Bernd & Kuvaev, Roman [Show all 19 contributors for this article] (2016). Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 48(9), p. 843–864. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-113128.
• Bretthauer, Michael; Aabakken, Lars; Dekker, Evelien; Kaminski, Michal Filip; Rösch, Thomas & Hultcrantz, Rolf [Show all 15 contributors for this article] (2016). Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement for reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 48(3), p. 291–294. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100186.
• Bretthauer, Michael; Kaminski, Michal Filip; Løberg, Magnus; Zauber, Ann G.; Regula, Jaroslaw & Kuipers, Ernst J. [Show all 20 contributors for this article] (2016). Population-Based colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer : A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine. ISSN 2168-6106. 176(7), p. 894–902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960.
• Jover, Rodrigo; Bretthauer, Michael; Dekker, Evelien; Holme, Øyvind; Kaminski, Michal Filip & Løberg, Magnus [Show all 22 contributors for this article] (2016). Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 48(6), p. 571–578. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104116.
• Rutter, Matthew D.; Senore, Carlo; Bisschops, Raf; Domagk, Dirk; Valori, Roland & Kaminski, Michal Filip [Show all 18 contributors for this article] (2016). The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures. United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal). ISSN 2050-6406. 4(1), p. 30–41. doi: 10.1177/2050640615624631.
• Rutter, Matthew D.; Senore, Carlo; Bisschops, Raf; Domagk, Dirk; Valori, Roland & Kaminski, Michal Filip [Show all 18 contributors for this article] (2016). The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: Developing performance measures. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 48(1), p. 81–89. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569580.
• Kaminski, Michal Filip; Anderson, John; Valori, R; Kraszewska, E; rupinski, maciej & pachlewski, jacek [Show all 11 contributors for this article] (2016). Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut. ISSN 0017-5749. 65(4), p. 616–624. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307503.
• Robertson, Douglas J.; Kaminski, Michal Filip & Bretthauer, Michael (2015). Effectiveness, training and quality assurance of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Gut. ISSN 0017-5749. 64(6), p. 982–990. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308076.
• Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad; Kaminski, Michal Filip; Lindenburger, Wolfgang; Wiig, Håvard; Hasund, Audun & Wronska, Ewa [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2015). Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 47(3), p. 192–199. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390795.

View all works in Cristin

• Kamiński, Michał Filip & Pilonis, Nastazja Dagny (2024). Multimodal cancer treatment with endoscopy. Baillière's Best Practice & Research : Clinical Gastroenterology. ISSN 1521-6918. 68. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101892.
• Kamiński, Michał Filip & Pilonis, Nastazja Dagny (2023). Commentary. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 55(12). doi: 10.1055/a-2178-9552.
• Hanley, James A.; Deck, Wilber; Winawer, Sidney J.; Hoffmeister, Michael; Cardoso, Rafael & Brenner, Hermann [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2023). Colonoscopy Screening and Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality. New England Journal of Medicine. ISSN 0028-4793. 388(4), p. 376–379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2215192.
• Mori, Yuichi; Kamiński, Michał Filip; Hassan, Cecare & Bretthauer, Michael (2022). Clinical trial designs for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology. ISSN 2468-1253. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00232-1.
• Pilonis, Nastazja Dagny & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2022). When it comes to continuous measurement of colonoscopy quality, patient survival is mandatory. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ISSN 0016-5107. 95(5), p. 954–955. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.044.
• Kamiński, Michał Filip (2022). Avoiding a plane crash with colonoscopy. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 54(3), p. 278–280. doi: 10.1055/a-1722-2999.
• Pilonis, Nastazja D. & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2021). Will machines decipher colonoscopy quality from endoscopists’ notes? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ISSN 0016-5107. 93(3), p. 758–760. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.11.021.
• Gralnek, Ian; Hassan, Cesare; Ebigbo, Alanna; Fuchs, Andre; Beilenhoff, Ulrike & Antonelli, Giulio [Show all 27 contributors for this article] (2021). ESGE and ESGENA Position Statement on gastrointestinal endoscopy and COVID-19: Updated guidance for the era of vaccines and viral variants. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. doi: 10.1055/a-1700-4897.
• Wieszczy, Paulina; Kamiński, Michał Filip & Regula, Jaroslaw (2020). Reply. Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. 159(5). doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.011.
• Pilonis, Nastazja D. & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2020). Colonoscopy quality: if you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ISSN 0016-5107. 92(1), p. 163–165. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3849.
• Regula, Jaroslaw & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2019). Comparing apples to apples. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 51(8), p. 713–714. doi: 10.1055/a-0958-2366.
• Bisschops, Raf; East, James; Hassan, Cesare; Hazewinkel, Yark; Kamiński, Michał Filip & Neumann, Helmut [Show all 19 contributors for this article] (2019). Correction: Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019 (Endoscopy DOI: 10.1055/a-1031-7657). Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 51(12). doi: 10.1055/a-1074-5788.
• Pilonis, Nastazja & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2018). Mucosal exposure devices for colonoscopy: see the forest for the trees. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ISSN 0016-5107. 88(2), p. 345–347. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.05.010.
• Bugajski, Marek & Kamiński, Michał Filip (2018). Devices for adenoma detection rate: Holy Grail or training tool? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ISSN 0016-5107. 87(1), p. 241–242. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.041.
• Nowakowski, Andrzej; Wojciechowska, Urszula; Wieszczy, Paulina; Cybulski, Marek; Kamiński, Michał Filip & Didkowska, Joanna (2017). Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Poland: is there an impact of the introduction of the organised screening? European Journal of Epidemiology (EJE). ISSN 0393-2990. 32(6), p. 529–532. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0291-6.
• Bretthauer, Michael; Kamiński, Michał Filip; Emilsson, Louise & Adami, Hans-Olov (2017). Uppföljning efter polypektomi: riktlinjer, tro och evidens. Läkartidningen. ISSN 0023-7205. 6.
• Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad & Kaminski, Michal Filip (2017). Water-aided insertion and CO2-assisted withdrawal: Do we still need routine sedation for colonoscopy? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ISSN 0016-5107. 85(1), p. 219–220. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.021.
• Kaminski, Michal Filip & Bretthauer, Michael (2016). Cancer surveillance in gastroenterology practice. Baillière's Best Practice & Research : Clinical Gastroenterology. ISSN 1521-6918. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.016.
• Bretthauer, Michael; Kaminski, Michal Filip; Hassan, Cecare; Kalager, Mette; Holme, Øyvind & Hoff, Geir [Show all 10 contributors for this article] (2016). America, We Are Confused: The Updated U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Colorectal Cancer Screening. Annals of Internal Medicine. ISSN 0003-4819. 166(2), p. 139–140. doi: 10.7326/M16-1805.
• Bugajski, Marek & Kaminski, Michal Filip (2015). Colonoscopy quality indicators: From individual performance to institutional policy. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 47(8), p. 667–668. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392251.
• Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad; Kaminski, Michal Filip & Bretthauer, Michael (2015). Reply to Ishaq et al. Endoscopy. ISSN 0013-726X. 47(10). doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392409.
• Kaminski, Michal Filip & Regula, Jaroslaw (2015). Adenoma detection race at colonoscopy: The good and the bad. Gastroenterology. ISSN 0016-5085. 149(2), p. 273–274. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.019.

View all works in Cristin