Linn Benita Brøderud

• Hermansen, Karin Berg; Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim; Pedersen, Reidar; Alnes, Rigmor Grete Einang; Brøderud, Linn & Romøren, Maria [Show all 7 contributors for this article] (2026). Healthcare professionals’ experiences of advance care planning conversations with frail older adults admitted to acute geriatric hospital units: a nested qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 26. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-15112-x. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Background: Advance care planning can support frail older adults, their next of kin, and healthcare professionals by clarifying patients’ values and preferences and improving communication toward the end of life. Despite these benefits, advance care planning remains underutilized, particularly among frail older adults with complex needs. Limited research has explored healthcare professionals’ experiences with initiating it in acute geriatric settings. As part of a broader research project focused on implementing advance care planning for older adults admitted to acute geriatric hospital units, this study aimed to explore healthcare professionals’ experiences with initiating these conversations. Methods: A qualitative sub-study, nested within a cluster randomized controlled trial, was conducted with implementation teams and other healthcare professionals from the six geriatric units in the intervention arm. They had recently started engaging in advance care planning with frail, acutely ill older patients and their next of kin. Data were collected through four focus groups and four dyadic interviews, involving a total of 24 participants. The data was analysed by using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Four themes developed as perceived benefits: (1) Amplifies the patients’ voice, (2) Improves communication with next of kin, (3) Influences treatment decisions and may avoid overtreatment (4) Contributes to meaningful work. Two themes developed as perceived challenges: (1) Uncertainty regarding the ACP documentation, (2) ACP conversations require dedicated time and focus. Conclusion: This study revealed that advance care planning conversations in acute geriatric hospital units can amplify patients’ voices and promote their participation in decision-making. Discussions about existential topics appear beneficial and rewarding for patients, next of kin and healthcare professionals, both for in-moment and future decisions. Time constraints may have led to missed opportunities to initiate ACP conversations with patients before the end of life, while documentation issues may have limited their impact on continuity of care. Trial registration https://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05681585. Registered 03.01.23.

• Hermansen, Karin Berg; Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim; Pedersen, Reidar; Alnes, Rigmor Grete Einang; Brøderud, Linn & Romøren, Maria [Show all 7 contributors for this article] (2026). Ethical challenges in acute geriatric care and advance care planning: a nested qualitative study. European Geriatric Medicine. ISSN 1878-7649. p. 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s41999-026-01563-2. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Purpose Ethical challenges are common in geriatrics, and moral dilemmas and conflicting interests can arise in advance care planning (ACP). Respecting the wishes of frail, acutely ill older patients while acting in their best interests can be challenging. This study was nested within a cluster randomized controlled trial aimed at implementing ACP in acute geriatric hospital units. The aim of this study was to explore clinicians’ experiences of ethical challenges in geriatric units before and during this implementation project. Methods Eight semi-structured interviews—four focus groups and four dyadic interviews—were conducted with a total of twenty-four participants, including implementation teams and other clinicians from the six intervention units. These participants had engaged in ACP with frail, acutely ill older patients and, preferably, their next of kin. The data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Results Four themes were developed: (1) navigating prognostic uncertainty while sustaining hope, (2) providing information that enables understanding and participation, (3) managing family disagreements and emotional strain, and (4) preserving dignity towards the end of life. The findings indicate that ethical challenges were often mitigated rather than intensified through ACP conversations. Conclusion Ethical challenges in acute geriatric care arose when patient autonomy was limited by cognitive impairment, unclear preferences, or family disagreement. Earlier preparation of patients and next of kin through ACP could facilitate early identification of potential disagreements and provide a stronger foundation for dialogue in acute situations.

• Brøderud, Linn; Romøren, Maria; Hermansen, Karin Berg; Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim; Thoresen, Lisbeth & Pedersen, Reidar (2025). Barriers and facilitators in implementing advance care planning for frail older patients acutely admitted to geriatric hospital units: a nested qualitative study. Frontiers in Health Services. 5. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1646541. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Background: Appropriate communication with patients is increasingly crucial in a growing elderly population to prevent both over- and undertreatment. Advance care planning (ACP) is recognized as a valuable communication process for patients, their relatives and healthcare professionals that facilitates future care and medical decision-making. Despite its importance, the uptake remains low, particularly among frail, older patients in hospitals. Methods: This qualitative substudy is nested within a cluster randomized controlled trial. Data collection involved eight semi-structured interviews conducted in acute geriatric hospital units receiving our implementation support program, along with informal data from interactions with the units during the implementation process. The aim was to explore healthcare professionals' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation and their experiences with the implementation support program. A semi-structured interview guide was used. The data was analyzed using content analysis. Results: Factors influencing ACP implementation were identified at three levels: a) the organizational level, b) the national level, and c) the clinical level. Participants recognized the critical role of timing, context, and patients' capacity. However, there was meaningful opportunities for ACP conversations in acute geriatric units. Overall, the experiences underscored the complex interplay of individual motivation and interest, organizational support, prioritization, available time and resources, and systemic factors that influence the integration of ACP into clinical practice, as well as the fact that research can act as both a barrier and a facilitator in implementation efforts. Discussion: This study illustrates the significant challenges in implementing ACP in acute hospital care. Despite a generally positive perception of ACP, its implementation was hindered by barriers such as overwhelming workload, production-oriented healthcare, the biomedical model, and lack of prioritization. These factors creates a cycle where short-term demands overshadow preventive and patient-centered interventions, limiting their perceived and documented benefits. Breaking this cycle will likely require targeted investment in the implementation of complex interventions.

• Westbye, Siri Færden; Romøren, Maria; Ahmed, Marc; Hermansen, Karin Berg; Brøderud, Linn & Wahl, Astrid Klopstad [Show all 9 contributors for this article] (2025). Measuring the level of implementation of advance care planning – a fidelity-based cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Health Services. 5. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1629242. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Introduction Advance care planning (ACP) is supported by evidence, legal and ethical principles and ACP guidelines. However, this complex intervention is often poorly implemented. This article presents a novel fidelity scale to measure the implementation of ACP and reports the preliminary testing of the scale at baseline in a larger trial aiming at implementing ACP in hospitals in Norway. Method The research design conducted was a cross-sectional measurement of fidelity to guidelines, conducted in 12 geriatric hospital units in Norway recruited using purposive sampling. The sample size for the larger trial was determined, based on prior research, to be at least four clusters in each arm. Due to the possibility of unit drop-out during the project period and to secure sufficient power, we included six units in the intervention arm and six in the control arm. For the baseline measurement we developed an ACP fidelity scale including three subscales: implementation, quality and penetration rate, each with 4–11 items. We ensured face and content validity through input from relevant theories and research, experts and users. Items were scored from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating no implementation and 5 indicating full implementation. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha and calculation of interrater reliability for the scales. Further psychometric testing could not be conducted at this stage due to the lack of variance in the items. Results The mean score for the implementation subscale was 1.213, with a median of 1, a standard deviation (SD) of 0.08, a standard error (SE) of 0.01, a variance of 0.01, and a range of 0.28 (minimum 1.14 and maximum 1.42). The scores in the subscale showed that none of the units had recommended implementation measures. Only a few professionals reported they had heard of ACP, but not the whole staff. Cronbach's alpha could not be estimated due to the lack of variation in the scores for this subscale. On the quality subscale, which assesses whether ACP is practiced in accordance with practice guidelines, the mean score was 1.11, the median was 1, the SD was 0.48, the SE was 0.06, the variance was 0.13, and the range was 1.27 (minimum 1 and maximum 2.27). The scores in this subscale showed that ACP was practiced sporadically by the palliative care team in only one unit, while the other staff did not engage in this practice at all. Cronbach's alpha for the subscale on quality was 0.887 (11 items) showing an acceptable internal consistency. For the penetration rate subscale, which measures how widespread the practice is, the mean score was 1.08, the median was 1, the SD was 0.28, the SE was 0.05, the variance was 0.08, and the range was from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 2. Among the total number of admitted geriatric patients, only 10% had received ACP in only one of the 12 units. Also, for this subscale, the model for Cronbach's alpha could not be applied. There was little variation in the low measurements, thus the interrater reliability was high, reflected in the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The ICC was 0,916 [−0,721,0.976] for the implementation subscale, 1.00 for the quality subscale, and 1.00 for the penetration rate subscale. Conclusion Our findings indicate very low implementation of ACP in acute geriatric hospital units in Norway. The newly developed ACP fidelity scale has the potential to serve as an important tool for improving the quality of healthcare services for older patients. However, more data is needed to validate the psychometric properties of the scale. Our study should be considered as a preliminary study, and the scale should be used with caution as long as its properties are not well validated. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05681585.

• Brøderud, Linn; Førde, Reidun; Romøren, Maria; Wahl, Astrid Klopstad & Pedersen, Reidar (2025). Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Advance Care Planning: A Qualitative Study at National and Organizational Levels. Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. ISSN 1356-1294. 31(4). doi: 10.1111/jep.70131. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Background Aging population, enhanced medical opportunities, increased costs and emphasis on patient participation make advance care planning (ACP) important and it provides an evidence-based framework to ensure patient autonomy in future healthcare decisions. Despite the extensive international research literature supporting ACP, implementation seems challenging. Implementing complex interventions like ACP probably requires a system-wide approach. However, there is scarce research on the barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation as perceived at national and organizational levels. Aim To explore the barriers and facilitators affecting ACP implementation as perceived at national and organizational levels. Methods Fifteen in-depth individual interviews were conducted with stakeholders at national and organizational levels. A semi-structured interview guide was used, targeting overarching conditions and framework factors that could have an impact. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results Barriers to ACP implementation described by participants included: Lack of prioritization of ACP at all levels; paradigms and culture of healthcare delivery, personal barriers and attitudes, and lack of competence; lack of collaboration and documentation between levels of healthcare; and lack of systems, routines, time and resources within healthcare services. Facilitators included: Cultural change; support in priority setting; national guideline and incentives; management commitment and support; systems, routines and local implementation efforts; ACP capacity building, implementation competence, and ethical reflection; dissemination of the benefits of ACP, including public education; and better collaboration and communication between levels of healthcare. Conclusion There appear to be significant barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation as perceived at the national and organizational levels of healthcare. Although ACP implementation appears to require a combination of top-down and bottom-up initiatives, national and organizational barriers and facilitators seem important in setting priorities in clinical practice, with an emphasis on financial incentives. An overarching cultural change of healthcare delivery that supports interventions such as ACP appears to be critical for improved implementation.

• Romøren, Maria; Hermansen, Karin Berg; Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim; Brøderud, Linn Benita; Westbye, Siri Færden & Wahl, Astrid Klopstad [Show all 10 contributors for this article] (2024). Implementation of advance care planning in the routine care for acutely admitted patients in geriatric units: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research. 24. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10666-0. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Background Acutely ill and frail older adults and their next of kin are often poorly involved in treatment and care decisions. This may lead to either over- or undertreatment and unnecessary burdens. The aim of this project is to improve user involvement and health services for frail older adults living at home, and their relatives, by implementing advance care planning (ACP) in selected hospital wards, and to evaluate the clinical and the implementation interventions. Methods This is a cluster randomized trial with 12 hospital units. The intervention arm receives implementation support for 18 months; control units receive the same support afterwards. The ACP intervention consists of 1. Clinical intervention: ACP; 2. Implementation interventions: Implementation team, ACP coordinator, network meetings, training and supervision for health care personnel, documentation tools and other resources, and fidelity measurements with tailored feedback; 3. Implementation strategies: leadership commitment, whole ward approach and responsive evaluation. Fidelity will be measured three times in the intervention arm and twice in the control arm. Here, the primary outcome is the difference in fidelity changes between the arms. We will also include 420 geriatric patients with one close relative and an attending clinician in a triadic sub-study. Here, the primary outcomes are quality of communication and decision-making when approaching the end of life as perceived by patients and next of kin, and congruence between the patient’s preferences for information and involvement and the clinician’s perceptions of the same. For patients we will also collect clinical data and health register data. Additionally, all clinical staff in both arms will be invited to answer a questionnaire before and during the implementation period. To explore barriers and facilitators and further explore the significance of ACP, qualitative interviews will be performed in the intervention units with patients, next of kin, health care personnel and implementation teams, and with other stakeholders up to national level. Lastly, we will evaluate resource utilization, costs and health outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Discussion The project may contribute to improved implementation of ACP as well as valuable knowledge and methodological developments in the scientific fields of ACP, health service research and implementation science.

• Ihle-Hansen, Hege Beate; Pedersen, Reidar; Westbye, Siri Færden; Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim; Brøderud, Linn Benita & Larsen, Marie Hamilton [Show all 9 contributors for this article] (2024). Patient preferences in geriatric wards, a survey of health care professionals’ practice, experience and attitudes. European Geriatric Medicine. ISSN 1878-7649. 15, p. 153–158. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00922-7. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Purpose We aimed to identify whether health care professionals (HCP) examine their patient and next-of-kin preferences, and to study whether medical decisions follow these preferences. Method A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted with multidisciplinary HCP from 12 geriatric wards in the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority. Results Of the 289 HCPs responding (response rate 61%), mean age 37.8 years (SD 11.3), 235 (81.3%) women, 12.4 (SD 9.6) years of experience and 67 (23.2%) medical doctors, only half report clarifying patients’ preferences. The majority reported that they did not inform, involve and treat in line with such preferences. However, 53% believe that HCP, patients and next-of-kin should make clinical decisions together. Discussion Our findings indicate a lack of engagement in conversation and inclusion of patient preferences when providing health interventions in geriatric wards. Measures for change of culture are needed.

• Ihle-Hansen, Hege Beate; Ihle-Hansen, Håkon; Rostoft, Siri; Munkhaugen, John; Westbye, Siri Færden & Romøren, Maria [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2024). Forhåndssamtaler om siste livsfase. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 144(13). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.24.0105. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Bakgrunn: Det foreligger nye nasjonale faglige råd om forhåndssamtaler om siste livsfase. Trygghet i kommunikasjon er viktig for implementering. Formålet med denne studien var å kartlegge helsepersonells selvopplevde trygghet i kommunikasjon om fremtidig helsehjelp og pasientens ønsker i livets sluttfase. Materiale og metode: Helsepersonell ved tolv geriatriske enheter i Helse Sør-Øst besvarte en nettbasert spørreundersøkelse høsten 2022. De fire svaralternativene for selvrapportert trygghet – «lite trygg», «nokså trygg», «meget trygg» og «svært trygg» – er slått sammen til to kategorier: «begrenset trygghet» («lite trygg» og «nokså trygg») og «høy trygghet» («meget trygg» og «svært trygg»). Resultater: Vi fikk svar fra 289 av 470 (61,5 %) av de inviterte, med en gjennomsnittsalder på 37,8 ± 11,3 år, hvorav 217 av 289 (75 %) hadde mer enn fem års yrkeserfaring. Blant legene rapporterte 15 av 67 (22 %) begrenset trygghet i kommunikasjon om «fremtidig forverring av pasientens helsetilstand», 20 av 67 (30 %) om «livsforlengende behandling» og 13 av 67 (19 %) om «ønsker for livets sluttfase». For annet helsepersonell var tilsvarende responser 119 av 222 (54 %), 140 av 222 (63 %) og 109 av 222 (49 %). Fortolkning: Egenvurdert trygghet i kommunikasjon om fremtidig forverring, fremtidig helsehjelp og pasientens egne ønsker i livets sluttfase varierer, og er begrenset blant mye helsepersonell i geriatriske enheter. Det synes nødvendig med tiltak for å øke tryggheten i kommunikasjon og implementering av forhåndssamtaler i helsetjenesten. Hovedfunn: Blant leger oppga 20 av 67 (30 %) begrenset trygghet i kommunikasjon om «fremtidig helsehjelp», mens av annet helsepersonell svarte 140 av 222 (63 %) det samme. For kommunikasjon om «ønsker for livets siste fase» fant vi at 13 av 67 (19 %) av legene og 109 av 222 (49 %) av annet helsepersonell oppga begrenset trygghet.

• Brøderud, Linn Benita; Pedersen, Reidar & Magelssen, Morten (2023). Balancing burdens of infection control: Norwegian district medical officers’ ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Health Services Research. 23(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09573-7. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Background In several countries, district medical officers (DMOs) are public health experts with duties including infection control measures. The Norwegian DMOs have been key actors in the local handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The aim of the study was to explore the ethical challenges experienced by Norwegian DMOs during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how the DMOs have handled these challenges. 15 in-depth individual research interviews were performed and analyzed with a manifest approach. Results Norwegian DMOs have had to handle a large range of significant ethical problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Often, a common denominator has been the need to balance burdens of the contagion control measures for different individuals and groups. In another large set of issues, the challenge was to achieve a balance between safety understood as effective contagion prevention on the one hand, and freedom, autonomy and quality of life for the same individuals on the other. Conclusions The DMOs have a central role in the municipality’s handling of the pandemic, and they wield significant influence. Thus, there is a need for support in decision-making, both from national authorities and regulations, and from discussions with colleagues.

View all works in NVA