Panagiotis Kavouras

• Førland, Ekaterina Prasolova; Garcia, Jose; Makhortova, Kseniia; Tobiassen, Stig Martin; Hokstad, Leif Martin & Bartlett, Harriet [Show all 9 contributors for this article] (2026). Stakeholder Engagement in Ethical and Human-Centered XR: A Framework for Inclusive and Participatory Learning Environments. In Kurita, Kayoko; Ilic, Peter; Howlett, Robert J. & Jain, Lakhmi C. (Ed.), Smart Education and e-Learning: Proceedings of KES-SEEL 2025 Conference. Springer. ISSN 9783032204585. p. 70–80. doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-20458-5_7. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This book contains the contributions presented at the 12th international KES conference on Smart Education and e-Learning

• Löfström, Erika; Lindemann, Tom; Blom, Fenneke; Evans, Natalie; Hoven, Mariette van den & Inguaggiato, Giulia [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2025). Fostering Research Integrity through Training: The training materials of four EU-funded projects through the lens of pedagogical underpinnings and three taxonomies of learning. Open Research Europe. 5, p. 301–301. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.20826.1. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Background This article provides an analysis of the pedagogical underpinnings that characterise the research integrity (RI) training approaches and materials developed by four European Union - funded projects. The approaches taken by these projects include a dialogical approach, an empowerment approach, a virtue ethics approach, and a constructivist case-based approach. We analysed the materials/trainings created in the projects. In doing so, we propose how to make use of a structured way of working with learning objectives, in order to ensure that research integrity training meets the needs of its target groups. Methods We applied qualitative, deductive content analysis in which we analysed the learning objectives stated in the training schemes of the four projects. A total of 46 learning objectives were analysed using three learning taxonomies, namely the revised Bloom's Taxonomy, the SOLO Taxonomy, and the Taxonomy of Significant Learning. Results The results show that the four RI trainings make use of either a constructivist or a socio-constructivist understanding of learning, implement activating and engaging learning activities, and emphasise high-order learning objectives. Conclusions The analysis suggests that taxonomies are applicable to various pedagogical underpinnings and can help trainers to communicate the objectives of training and learners to relate their expectations to the objectives. We identify implications for training design and suggest recommendations for training developers. It is advisable to pay attention to learning objectives dedicated to foster the higher levels of learning and understanding. Less commonly applied taxonomies in the context of integrity training, such as the Taxonomy of Significant Learning can help to identify relevant learning objectives both for trainers as well as learners. Research cultures and disciplinary differences are generally not spelled out at the level of learning objectives highlighting the need to consider these explicitly in training implementation.

• Hofmann, Bjørn Morten; Zinöcker, Severin; Holm, Søren; Lewis, Jonathan & Kavouras, Panagiotis (2022). Organoids in the Clinic: A Systematic Review of Outcomes. Cells Tissues Organs. ISSN 1422-6405. 212(6), p. 499–511. doi: 10.1159/000527237. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Research on organoids has undergone significant advances during the last decade. However, outcomes from the use of organoids in clinical trials have not yet been documented. Therefore, there is an urgent need to assess the reporting of clinically relevant outcomes from organoid research in the scientific literature. This article presents a systematic review and appraisal of the published literature in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, together with a synopsis of recent relevant reviews. Surprisingly, no randomized controlled trials have reported clinical outcomes with any types of organoids. We found very few ongoing and registered studies that may provide clinically relevant results within this decade. Our screening and interpretation of the literature, including review articles, indicate a focus on technical and preclinical aspects of organoid research. This is the first systematic review of clinical trials involving organoids. Few clinical studies are planned or already underway, and, so far, no high-quality evidence relating to the clinical outcomes of organoid research has been published. The many promises of organoid research still need to be translated from bench to bed.

View all works in NVA

• Rochambeau, Mathieu; Konach, Teodora; Chai, Sabine; Bernabe, Rosemarie de La Cruz; Lindemann, Tom & Kavouras, Panagiotis [Show all 33 contributors for this article] (2023). Strategic Policy Paper on Responsible Open Science. doi: https:/zenodo.org/records/10807047. Full text in Research Archive
• Rochambeau, Mathieu; Konach, Teodora; Bernabe, Rosemarie de La Cruz; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Mocheche, Lilian Kwamboka & Dash, Keziah Chanyisa Khayadi [Show all 20 contributors for this article] (2025). ROSiE Field-specific Guidelines on Responsible Open Science. Zenodo. doi: https:/zenodo.org/records/14969023. Full text in Research Archive
• Bernabe, Rosemarie de La Cruz; Baraas, Rigmor C.; Barngrover, Michael; Dawkins, Shereen Cox Née; Hagen, Lene Aarvelta & Kadlubsky, Alina [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2025). XR4HUMAN Code of Conduct for the Human-Centered and Ethical Development of Immersive Technologies. Zenodo. doi: https:/zenodo.org/records/17035113. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA