Publications from Institute of Health and Society

• Egilsdottir, H. Ösp; Heyn, Lena; Brembo, Espen Andreas; Byermoen, Kirsten Røland; Moen, Anne & Eide, Hilde (2022). The value of a redesigned clinical course during COVID-19 pandemic: an explorative convergent mixed-methods study. BMC Nursing. ISSN 1472-6955. 21(1), p. 1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00872-8.
• Sanhori, Zeinat; Lien, Lars; Hauff, Edvard; Ayazi, Touraj; Mdala, Ibrahimu & Eide, Arne Henning (2022). Change in Disability Associated with Psychological Distress among Internally Displaced Persons in Central Sudan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH). ISSN 1661-7827. 19(9). doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095347.
• Ambugo, Eliva Atieno; Dar, Imran; Bikova, Mariya Stoyanova; Førland, Oddvar & Tjerbo, Trond (2022). A qualitative study on promoting reablement among older people living at home in Norway: opportunities and constraints. BMC Health Services Research. ISSN 1472-6963. 22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07543-z.
• Jølstad, Borgar & Solberg, Carl Tollef (2022). Reciprocity as an Argument for Prioritizing Healthcare Workers for the COVID-19 Vaccine. De Ethica. ISSN 2001-8819. Show summary

  During the recent debates on whether to prioritize healthcare workers for COVID-19 vaccines, two lines of argument were prevalent, namely arguments centered on maximizing health, either with or without a special emphasis on the worse off, and arguments centered on reciprocity. In this article, we scrutinize the arguments of reciprocity. The notions of fittingness and proportionality are fundamental for the act of reciprocating, and we consider the importance of these notions for various arguments from reciprocity, showing that the arguments are problematic. If there is a plausible argument for reciprocity during the COVID-19 pandemic, this is most likely one that centers on the risk that healthcare workers take on as part of their jobs. Furthermore, we argue that the scope of this argument should not be extended only to healthcare workers, other essential workers at risk are in a position to make the same arguments. We also consider whether reciprocating with vaccines, rather than by other means, is necessary. Allocating vaccines based on reciprocity will arguably conflict with utility-maximizing, concerns for the worse off, and equity concerns. Given the weak state of the reciprocity arguments, we conclude that overriding these concerns seems unreasonable.

• Itoh, Hayato; Oda, Masahiro; Jiang, Kai; Mori, Yuichi; Misawa, Masashi & Kudo, Shin-Ei [Show all 10 contributors for this article] (2022). Uncertainty meets 3D-spatial feature in colonoscopic polyp-size determination. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization. ISSN 2168-1163. 10(3). doi: 10.1080/21681163.2021.2004445.
• Mickelson, Nina; Mellingsæter, Mr; Hegna, Bendik Westlund; Saltyte Benth, Jurate; Einvik, Gunnar & Juliebø, Vibeke [Show all 8 contributors for this article] (2022). Impact of a dementia-friendly program on detection and management of patients with cognitive impairment and delirium in acute-care hospital units: a controlled clinical trial design. BMC Geriatrics. ISSN 1471-2318. 22(1), p. 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02949-0.
• Gezelius, Stig Strandli & Veggeland, Frode (2022). Hvordan fremme dyrevelferdslovens formål? Konklusjoner fra forskningsprosjektet. In Gezelius, Stig Strandli & Veggeland, Frode (Ed.), Forvaltningen av dyrevelferd i Norge -- Hvordan få lovverk til å virke?. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISSN 978-82-02-71624-0. p. 357–368. doi: https%3A/doi.%20org/10.23865/noasp.159.ch12. Full text in Research Archive
• Gezelius, Stig Strandli; Storstad, Oddveig & Veggeland, Frode (2022). Bøndene og dyrevelferdsforvaltningen: En flermetodisk studie av husdyrprodusenters erfaringer. In Gezelius, Stig Strandli & Veggeland, Frode (Ed.), Forvaltningen av dyrevelferd i Norge -- Hvordan få lovverk til å virke?. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISSN 978-82-02-71624-0. p. 313–355. doi: https%3A/doi.org/10.23865/noasp.159.ch11. Full text in Research Archive
• Gezelius, Stig Strandli & Veggeland, Frode (2022). Innledning. In Gezelius, Stig Strandli & Veggeland, Frode (Ed.), Forvaltningen av dyrevelferd i Norge -- Hvordan få lovverk til å virke?. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISSN 978-82-02-71624-0. p. 9–19. doi: https%3A/doi.org/10.23865/noasp.159.ch1. Full text in Research Archive
• Portnoy, Allison; Nygård, Mari; Trogstad, Lill; Kim, Jane J. & Burger, Emily Annika (2022). Impact of Delaying Effective and Cost-Effective Policy Decisions: An Example From Cervical Cancer Prevention in Norway. Medical Decision Making Policy & Practice. ISSN 2381-4683. 7(1). doi: 10.1177/23814683211071093.
• Tverdal, Cathrine Buaas; Aarhus, Mads; Rønning, Pål Andre; Skaansar, Ola Fougner; Skogen, Karoline & Andelic, Nada [Show all 7 contributors for this article] (2022). Incidence of emergency neurosurgical TBI procedures: a population-based study. BMC Emergency Medicine. ISSN 1471-227X. 22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00561-w.

View all works in Cristin

• Gezelius, Stig Strandli & Veggeland, Frode (2022). Forvaltningen av dyrevelferd i Norge -- Hvordan få lovverk til å virke? Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISBN 978-82-02-71624-0. 372 p.

View all works in Cristin

• Veggeland, Frode & Stokstad, Sigrid (2022). Enhetlig og helhetlig forvaltning? Mattilsynets organisering og styring av dyrevelferdsarbeidet. In Gezelius, Stig Strandli & Veggeland, Frode (Ed.), Forvaltningen av dyrevelferd i Norge -- Hvordan få lovverk til å virke?. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISSN 978-82-02-71624-0. doi: 10.23865/noasp.159.ch4.
• Godager, Geir (2022). Bounded rationality models and their application to experimental data.
• Søndbø, Mildrid Hagrønning; Magelssen, Morten; Solberg, Carl Tollef; Luther, Iren Mari & Sørlie, Christine Haga (2022). Vi må sette etikken i høysetet. Sykepleien. ISSN 0802-9768. 110(88475), p. e1–e7. doi: 10.4220/Sykepleiens.2022.88475. Show summary

  Alle avdelinger bør ha et tilbud om etikkrefleksjon. Det er langt fra realiteten i dag, viser en undersøkelse. I november 2021 sendte Rådet for sykepleieetikk, kommune- og spesialisthelsetjenesten (KS) og Senter for medisinsk etikk (SME) en spørreundersøkelse til 5853 sykepleieledere i kommune- og spesialisthelsetjenesten. Vi stilte spørsmål om den systematiske etiske refleksjonen: I hvor stor grad eksisterer den? Resultatene var både oppløftende og nedslående. Bare 39 prosent av sykepleielederne svarte at deres ansatte hadde et tilbud om etisk refleksjon. Kun 10 prosent av de spurte besvarte undersøkelsen. Det kan bety at de som faktisk driver etikkarbeid, var mer tilbøyelig til å svare. I så fall er 39 prosent høyere enn det reelle tallet.

• Jodal, Henriette C. & Løberg, Magnus (2022). Letter: towards gender-stratified colorectal cancer screening and surveillance? Authors’ reply. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. ISSN 0269-2813. 55(4), p. 506–507. doi: 10.1111/apt.16764.
• Bensnes, Simon Søbstad; Telle, Kjetil Elias & Snilsberg, Øyvind (2022). Hvem bruker «Fritt behandlingsvalg»? Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning. ISSN 0809-2052. doi: 10.18261/tfv.25.1.5.
• Vallersnes, Odd Martin (2022). Erfaringer fra arbeidet med forgiftningstilstander med sentralstimulerende rusmidler og GHB ved Legevakten i Oslo.
• Sørbye, Ingvil; Bains, Sukhjeet & Owe, Katrine Mari (2022). Authors' reply re: Obstetric anal sphincter injury by maternal origin and length of residence. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ISSN 1470-0328. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17079.
• Lindberg, Bent Håkan; Høye, Sigurd & Rebnord, Ingrid Keilegavlen (2022). Can telephone triage nurses influence a population’s out-of-hours attendance? A biangular approach.

View all works in Cristin