Jan Helge Solbakk

• Solbakk, J.H. (2021). Bio(po)ethics – didactic inspirations In: C. Mounsey and M. Mant (Eds.). You've Got to Be Carefully Taught: Bioethics and Education. Routledge: 147-184.
• Solbakk, J.H., Bentzen, H.B, Holm, S., et al. (2021). Back to WHAT? The role of research ethics in pandemic times. Medicine, Health  Care and Philosophy; 24:3–20.
• Solbakk, J.H (2018). You Can’t Go Home Again - on the conceptualization of disasters in ancient Greek tragedy. In: D. O’Mathuna, V. Dranseika and B. Gordijn (Eds.). Core Concepts and Ethical Theories, Advancing Global Bioethics 11. Dordrecht: Springer: 87-104.
• Solbakk, J.H. (2018). You Can’t Go Home Again – bioethical and didactic reflections on the fate of women and children in armed conflicts. In: H ten Have (Ed.). Global Education in Bioethics. Dordrecht: Springer:119-151.
• Solbakk J.H. Development and Bioethics (2015). In: H. ten Have (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Dordrecht: Springer: 140-1.
• Solbakk J.H. (2015). What is it to do good medical ethics? On the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘goodness’ in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics; 41:12–16.
• Solbakk, J.H. Movements and Movies in Bioethics: The Use of Theatre and Cinema in Teaching Bioethics (2014). In: Henk ten Have (Ed.). Bioethics Education in a Global Perspective, Advancing Global Bioethics 4. Dordrecht: Springer: 203-221.
• Solbakk, J.H. (2014). The whole and the art of medical dialectic: a platonic account. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy: 1; 17:39–52.
• Solbakk, J.H. (2013). Bioethics on the couch. Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics; 22: 319–327.
• Solbakk JH, Zoloth L. (2011). The Tragedy of Translation:The Case of ‘‘First Use’’in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Cell Stem Cell; 8: 479-48.

• Cox Née Dawkins, Shereen; Solbakk, Jan Helge; Luthardt, Frederick & Bernabe, Rosemarie de La Cruz (2023). Institutional Review Boards and post-approval monitoring (PAM) of human research: content analysis of select university (academic health center) web pages across the USA. Current Medical Research and Opinion. ISSN 0300-7995. 39(3), p. 341–350. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2175999. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Objective: To conduct a content analysis of IRB webpages of select universities (academic health centers) in the USA that describe post IRB- approval monitoring activities. Method: This was a qualitative study. Thematic analysis was the method to review the webpage content of selected academic health centers (AHC) within the USA. Results: Some US academic health “centers” IRB administrative or research compliance offices conduct post- approval monitoring (PAM) of human subjects’ research including clinical trials. The goals of this PAM programmes are to (a) ensure compliance to approved protocols, (b) preserve research integrity, (c) manage institutional risks, d) provide advisory/educational support to researchers, (e) recommend corrective actions for identified issues, and most importantly, (f) to protect the safety, rights, and well-being of research participants. Although not a requirement by law, the PAM program has legislative support in the US Code of Federal Regulations as part of the US Office for Human Research Protection’s (OHRP) Federal Wide Assurance (FWA). This is especially for institutions that conduct studies funded by the Federal government. PAM on-site checks reveal various incidents of protocol deviations and violations. This includes issues with recruitment processes, informed consent discrepancies, and incidents of non-compliance. When a study protocol is identified as non-compliant, the principal investigator works with the PAM monitor to develop a corrective action plan that would allow the study to become compliant and avoid sanctions from the IRB or the regulatory authority. Conclusions: REC/IRB post-approval monitoring of clinical trials is a valuable mechanism of protection for research participants while giving educational and quality assurance support to researchers. The program enables early detection and resolution of non-compliance to approved protocols. The impact of the program in the USA requires further exploration.

• Cox Née Dawkins, Shereen; Solbakk, Jan Helge & Bernabe, Rosemarie de La Cruz (2022). Research ethics committees and post-approval activities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of European research ethics committee representatives. Current Medical Research and Opinion. ISSN 0300-7995. p. 1–10. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2115773. Show summary

  Objective: To explore the views of Research Ethics Committee (REC) representatives in the European Union (EU) on what the status quo is in terms of RECs’ activities after the approval of trial protocols for clinical studies. Method: This is a qualitative study. The participants in this study are members or representatives of a research ethics committee from the member countries of the European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) and the United Kingdom. Thematic analysis was the method to assess interview transcripts. Results: Interviews of REC representatives from 19 countries across Europe reveals that REC postapproval activities are predominantly limited to review and approval of protocol amendments. The majority of the RECs do not have mandatory continuing reviews or receipt of notifications of adverse events or protocol violations. In fact, most post-approval activities are the remit of the regulatory authorities. The interviewed members were also of the opinion that RECs in the EU do not have the legislative support, the organizational structure, the expert staff nor time to do active post approval follow-up. Conclusions: Post-approval follow-up activities for clinical studies by RECs is a valuable resource and means for early detection and resolution of protocol deviations and violations. However, a majority of RECs within Europe do not have active post-approval follow-up of approved protocols. The interviews revealed that resource challenges such as time, personnel, and organizational structure contribute to the lack of follow-up by RECs. Some RECs in the represented countries do not identify post-approval follow-up as part of their mandate but instead place emphasis on the culture of trust between the RECs and researchers. Current EU Regulations do not directly address the role of the REC after the approval of clinical trials.

• Ewnetu, Demelash Bezabih; Combs Thorsen, Viva; Solbakk, Jan Helge & Magelssen, Morten (2021). Navigating abortion law dilemmas: experiences and attitudes among Ethiopian health care professionals. BMC Medical Ethics. ISSN 1472-6939. 22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00735-y. Full text in Research Archive
• Cox Née Dawkins, Shereen; Solbakk, Jan Helge & Bernabe, Rosemarie de la Cruz (2021). The role of research ethics committees after the approval of clinical trial protocols in the EU and the USA: a descriptive content analysis of international and regional normative documents. Current Medical Research and Opinion. ISSN 0300-7995. 37(6), p. 1061–1069. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1905621. Show summary

  Aim: To conduct a descriptive content analysis of normative documents on the role of research ethics committees (RECs) after the approval of clinical trial protocols. The question to be addressed is whether and to what extent normative documents support a monitoring role for RECs in the United States and the European Union. Design: A qualitative content analysis of 19 normative documents on clinical research as outlined by the International Compilation of Human Research Standards 2020 edition and other related documents for the EU and USA. Results: After the approval of research protocols, RECs’ general role is to receive reports from researchers on the trials’ progress. Additionally, RECs receive notifications of protocol amendments, deviations and, to a lesser extent, violations, which is the remit of the regulatory/competent authorities. RECs are expected to issue opinions on clinical trials’ progress and give supplemental opinions/approval or withdraw/suspend/terminate previous favorable opinions on adverse events or safety concerns that may arise. RECs are to receive an end of the trial report. Conclusion: The role of RECs post approval of protocols is to protect human participants through activities such as continuing review of: (a) progress reports, (b) notifications of significant protocol amendments, (c) adverse events, (d) protocol deviations, and (e) protocol violations. Although some international guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki emphasize the right to monitor, RECs’ predominant activity is document review. In the USA, RECs are authorized to issue approvals and terminate/suspend previously issued approvals. However, in the EU, the approach is to relegate to member states to decide the extent of legislative power they wish to give to the RECs. The REC’s opinion on the end of trial report is identified as an area for further exploration.

• Lemmo, Daniela; Martino, Maria Luisa; Cesaro, Adele Nunziante & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2020). Idiosyncratic ambivalence: A three-dimensional interpretative model to understand the non-adhesion of women to breast and cervical cancer screening. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology (MJCP). ISSN 2282-1619. 8(3). doi: 10.6092/2282-1619/mjcp-2563.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Holm, Søren; Heggestad, Anne Kari Tolo; Hofmann, Bjørn Morten & Robertsen, Annette [Show all 10 contributors for this article] (2020). Back to WHAT? The role of research ethics in pandemic times. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy. ISSN 1386-7423. p. 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09984-x. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The Covid-19 pandemic creates an unprecedented threatening situation worldwide with an urgent need for critical reflection and new knowledge production, but also a need for imminent action despite prevailing knowledge gaps and multilevel uncertainty. With regard to the role of research ethics in these pandemic times some argue in favor of exceptionalism, others, including the authors of this paper, emphasize the urgent need to remain committed to core ethical principles and fundamental human rights obligations all reflected in research regulations and guidelines carefully crafted over time. In this paper we disentangle some of the arguments put forward in the ongoing debate about Covid-19 human challenge studies (CHIs) and the concomitant role of health-related research ethics in pandemic times. We suggest it might be helpful to think through a lens differentiating between risk, strict uncertainty and ignorance. We provide some examples of lessons learned by harm done in the name of research in the past and discuss the relevance of this legacy in the current situation.

• Ewnetu, Demelash Bezabih; Combs Thorsen, Viva; Solbakk, Jan Helge & Magelssen, Morten (2020). Still a moral dilemma: How Ethiopian professionals providing abortion come to terms with conflicting norms and demands. BMC Medical Ethics. ISSN 1472-6939. 21(1), p. 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0458-7. Full text in Research Archive
• Paranhos, Flávio R. L; Garrafa, Volnei & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2019). The Theory of Common Morality of Bernard Gert . Revista Brasileira de Bioética (RBB). ISSN 1984-1760. 15(1), p. 1–14. doi: 10.26512/rbb.v15i1.26866. Full text in Research Archive
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2019). Poetikk i praksis: Om det tragiske og komiske i medisinen. Filosofisk supplement. ISSN 0809-8220. 15(1), p. 56–65.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2018). You Can't Go Home Again: On the Conceptualization of Disasters in Ancient Greek Tragedy. In O'Mathúna, Dónal P.; Dranseika, Vilius & Gordijn, Bert (Ed.), Disasters: Core Concepts and Ethical Theories. Springer Nature. ISSN 978-3-319-92721-3. p. 87–104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92722-0. Full text in Research Archive
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2018). You Can't Go Home Again - Bioethical Reflections on War Veterans and Refugees as Survivors. In ten Have, Henk A.M.J (Eds.), Global Education in Bioethics. Springer Nature. ISSN 978-3-319-78983-5. p. 119–151. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78984-2.
• Santos, Marcos L.; Solbakk, Jan Helge & Garrafa, Volnei (2018). The rise of reimbursement-based medicine: the case of bone metastasis radiation treatment. Journal of Medical Ethics. ISSN 0306-6800. 44(3), p. 171–173. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103607.
• Castillo, Camilo Hernan Manchola & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2017). Bioethics and imagination: Towards a narrative bioethics committed to social action and justice. Medical Humanities. ISSN 1468-215X. 43(3), p. 166–171. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2016-011079.
• Magelssen, Morten; Nortvedt, Per & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2016). Rationing at the bedside: Immoral or unavoidable? Clinical Ethics. ISSN 1477-7509. 11(4), p. 112–121. doi: 10.1177/1477750916657664.
• Allon, Irit; Ben-Yehudah, Ahmi; Dekel, Raz; Solbakk, Jan Helge; Weltring, Klaus-Michael & Siegal, Gil (2016). Ethical issues in nanomedicine: Tempest in a teapot? Medicine, Health care and Philosophy. ISSN 1386-7423. 20(1), p. 3–11. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9720-7.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2015). Development and Bioethics. In ten Have, Henk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer. ISSN 978-3-319-05544-2. p. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2015). What is it to do good medical ethics? On the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘goodness’ in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics. ISSN 0306-6800. 41(1), p. 12–16. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102310.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Movements and Movies in Bioethics: The Use of Theatre and Cinema in Teaching Bioethics. In ten Have, Henk A.M.J (Eds.), Bioethics Education in a Global Perspective. Challenges in global bioethics. Springer Publishing Company. ISSN 978-94-017-9231-8. p. 203–21. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9232-5_16.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Lost in delusion: Reflections on the Article: “The 50th Anniversary of the Declaration of Helsinki. Progress but Many Remaining Challenges”. Revista Redbioética. ISSN 2077-9445. 5(1), p. 79–86.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). The whole and the art of medical dialectic: a platonic account. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy. ISSN 1386-7423. 17(1), p. 39–52. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9484-2.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Over ævne: Etikkens rolle i møte med hat, raseri og ekstreme handlinger. In Jupskås, Anders Ravik & Jupskås, Anders Ravik (Ed.), Akademiske perspektiver på 22. juli. Akademisk Forlag. ISSN 9788232101313. p. 145–160.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge & Vidal, Susana Maria (2013). Clinical Research in Resource-poor Settings. In ten Have, A.M.J., & Gordin, B (Ed.), Handbook of Global Bioethics. Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. ISSN 978-94-007-2512-6. p. 527–550. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_102.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Norway. In ten Have, A.M.J., & Gordin, B (Ed.), Handbook of Global Bioethics. Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. ISSN 978-94-007-2512-6. p. 1347–1367.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). The whole and the art of medical dialectic: a platonic account. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy. ISSN 1386-7423. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9484-2.
• Haimes, Erica; Skene, Loane; Ballantyne, Angela J; Caulfield, Timothy; Goldstein, Lawrence C & Huyn, Insoo [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2013). Position Statement on the Provision and Procurement of Human Eggs for Stem Cell Research. Cell Stem Cell. ISSN 1934-5909. 12(3), p. 285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.02.002.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Bioethics on the couch. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. ISSN 0963-1801. 22(3), p. 319–327. doi: 10.1017/S0963180113000133.

View all works in Cristin

• Ruyter, Knut W; Førde, Reidun & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Medisinsk og helsefaglig etikk. Gyldendal Akademisk. ISBN 978-82-05-46110-9. 390 p.

View all works in Cristin

• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2021). Bio(po)ethics - didactic inspirations. In Mant, Madeleine & Mounsey, Chris (Ed.), The History and Bioethics of Medical Education. Routledge. ISSN 9780367619350. p. 147–184.
• Ishaq, Bushra; Aukrust, Pål; Diaz, Esperanza; Solbakk, Jan Helge; Bjertness, Espen & Tyssvang, Marius [Show all 7 contributors for this article] (2021). Hvorfor er koronasmitten så høy blant minoriteter? Vi trenger grundige analyser. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge; Cox, Shereen; Bernabe, Rosemarie de la Cruz & Vidal Suarez, Susana Maria (2021). Covid 19, Comedy and Crimes against Humanity. Uniforum. ISSN 1891-5825.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge; Bernabe, Rosemarie de la Cruz & Cox, Shereen (2020). Kynisk svar om TRIPS. Klassekampen. ISSN 0805-3839.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge; Bernabe, Rosemarie de la Cruz & Cox, Shereen (2020). Mer enn symbolpolitikk. Klassekampen. ISSN 0805-3839.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Holm, Søren; Heggestad, Anne Kari Tolo; Hofmann, Bjørn Morten & Robertsen, Annette [Show all 10 contributors for this article] (2020). Høyrisikostudier på alle mennesker i Covid-19-sammenheng er etisk uforsvarlig. Uniforum. ISSN 1891-5825.
• Vogt, Henrik; Solbakk, Jan Helge & Hofmann, Bjørn Morten (2019). The precision paradox in personalized medicine: How can uncertainty be reduced when statistics do not apply?
• Magelssen, Morten; Oftestad, Eivor Andersen & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2018). Abortlov uten diskriminering. Vårt land. ISSN 0805-5424. p. 14–15.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2017). Når systemet - ikke mennesket - settes i sentrum. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 28(3).
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2017). Varsling ved OUS - en høyrisikosport. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 28(1).
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2017). Trakassering - et mangehodet troll. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 28(4), p. 36–36.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2017). Skamløs etikk. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 28(2), p. 40–40.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge & Kierulf, Peter (2016). Hvor alvorlig tar OUS brudd på god forskningskultur? NRK Ytring.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2016). Om forskere, forskningskulturer og folkefiender. Uniforum. ISSN 1891-5825.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge & Kierulf, Peter (2016). Stipendiater behandles som melkekyr. NRK Ytring.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2016). Når foretaksmakten går pengemaktens ærend. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2016). Uhendig håndbok om etikk i psykiatrien. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. 136. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1282.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2016). Pan(dem)isk om zika-viruset. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. p. 42–43.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2016). Panisk om zika-pandemi. NRK Ytring.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge & Hofmann, Bjørn (2015). Vrøvl om forskningsetikk. Morgenbladet. ISSN 0805-3847.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2015). Når de beste ikke makter mer. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 25(4).
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2015). Aktiv dødshjelp - nye tall, gamle bekymringer. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 25(3).
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2015). Glassperlespillerne. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 25(2).
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2015). Jeg er Fatima. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 25(1).
• Ljøsne, Isabelle Budin; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Solbakk, Jan Helge & Myklebost, Ola (2015). Genome sequencing in research requires a new approach to consent. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. 135(22), p. 2031–2032. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0944.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2015). Torkel Brekkes brekninger. Dagbladet. ISSN 0805-3766.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2015). Akademisk elefantiasis. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. 135. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0270.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2015). Tragisk, men nødvendig. Overlegen. ISSN 1503-2663. p. 20–20.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge; Sundin, Maj-Len; Fisknes, Ole Hermann & Slettebø, Haldor (2015). Vetoretten til dei pårørande bør avgrensast. Bergens Tidende. ISSN 0804-8983.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Ebolafrykt og mistillit. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 24(3).
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Glamorøs matprat. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. p. 29–29.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Forskning er ikke etterforskning. VG : Verdens gang. ISSN 0805-5203.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Forskning for livet. Ærefrykt for døden. Dagens medisin. ISSN 1501-4290.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Høyres totalitære helselov. Morgenbladet. ISSN 0805-3847.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Lidelsens komedie. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 24(2), p. 46–47.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Liberalisme på (ny)norsk. Vårt land. ISSN 0805-5424.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge & Magelssen, Morten (2014). Reservasjon og moralsk språkforvirring. Vårt land. ISSN 0805-5424.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Om å blande kortene i omskjæringsdebatten. Dagens medisin. ISSN 1501-4290.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Les teksten Høie. Ytring : NRK.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Forankringspunkt i modernitetens tidsalder. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.13.1467.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Pasientdata til salgs. Ytring : NRK.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2014). Om det tragiske i medisinen. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. p. 36–36.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Snuoperasjonen fortsetter. Ytring : NRK.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Gransk dine grunner, Høie. Ytring : NRK.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Privat godhet svekker FN. Ytring : NRK.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Hull i hodet om omskjæring. Dagens medisin. ISSN 1501-4290.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Blinde flekker i omskjæringsdebatten. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Religion - brennbart stoff. Vårt land. ISSN 0805-5424.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Hukommelse og fortrengning i helsepolitikken. Morgenbladet. ISSN 0805-3847.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Klar tale i helsepolitikken. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Bør en terrorist få lov til å utdanne seg? Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Dikt og løgn i helsepolitikken. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Moralsk feighet. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Hva mener Jonas og Jens med "FELLES ANSVAR"? Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 23(2), p. 48–49.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Pervertert samhandling. Ytring : NRK.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Støres fortielser. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Mange kikkere - flere overgrep. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge & Kjetil, Rommetveit (2013). Tvilsom trygghet. VG : Verdens gang. ISSN 0805-5203.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Tilslørende tale, Jonas Gahr Støre. Klassekampen. ISSN 0805-3839.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Pasienten som kunde. Ytring : NRK.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Den religiøse ateismen. Morgenbladet. ISSN 0805-3847.
• Norderval, Øyvind & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). "Inge Lønning". Nekrolog. [Newspaper]. Adresseavisen.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge & Norderval, Øyvind (2013). "Inge Lønning". Nekrolog. [Newspaper]. Aftenposten.
• Norderval, Øyvind & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). "Takk, lærer". Nekrolog over Inge Lønning. [Newspaper]. Bergens tidende.
• Norderval, Øyvind & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). "Inge Lønning (1938-2013): Ved veis ende". [Newspaper]. Klassekampen.
• Norderval, Øyvind & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). "Inge Lønning til minne". Nekrolog over professor Inge Lønning. [Newspaper]. Vårt Land.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Narrenes teater. NRK - www.nrk.no.
• Rommetveit, Kjetil & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Hvem tjener på den genetiske nypaternalismen? Morgenbladet. ISSN 0805-3847.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge & Kjetil, Rommetveit (2013). Tåkelegger fakta. VG : Verdens gang. ISSN 0805-5203.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Tør Erna og Jonas si 'nei'? Ytring : NRK.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Kulturreiser og klasseklatring. Legekunsten. ISSN 0804-1717. 23(1), p. 48–49.
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2013). Avkledd og dekodet. Dagbladet. ISSN 0805-3766.
• Ljøsne, Isabelle Budin; Solbakk, Jan Helge; Harris, Jennifer Ruth & Myklebost, Ola (2018). Bringing personalized medicine to people. Universitetet i Oslo. ISSN 978-82-8377-210-4.

View all works in Cristin