Frederik Emil Juul

• Nilsen, Jens Aksel; Juul, Frederik Emil; Egeland, Anders; Tandberg, Petter; Norvard, Espen & Lund-Iversen, Terje [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2025). Colorectal ESD in a nordic community hospital: learning curves and clinical outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. ISSN 0036-5521. 60(11), s. 1043–1052. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2025.2553279. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Bretthauer, Michael; Johnsen, Peter Holger; Samy, Faye; Tonby, Kristian & Berdal, Jan-Erik [Vis alle 29 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2025). Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Versus Vancomycin for Primary Clostridioides difficile Infection : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. ISSN 0003-4819. 178(7), s. 940–947. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-03285. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nilsen, Jens Aksel; Bernklev, Linn; Bretthauer, Michael; Kalager, Mette; Jodal, Henriette C. & Løberg, Magnus [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2024). Kirurgisk behandling av benigne kolorektale polypper 2008–21. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 144(10). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0722. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Cross, Amanda J.; Schoen, Robert E.; Senore, Carlo; Pinsky, Paul F. & Miller, Eric A. [Vis alle 17 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2024). Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Network Open. 7(2). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0007. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Importance: Randomized clinical screening trials have shown that sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Colonoscopy has largely replaced sigmoidoscopy for CRC screening, but long-term results from randomized trials on colonoscopy screening are still lacking. Objective: To estimate the additional screening benefit of colonoscopy compared with sigmoidoscopy. Design, setting, and participants: This comparative effectiveness simulation study pooled data on 358 204 men and women randomly assigned to sigmoidoscopy screening or usual care in 4 randomized sigmoidoscopy screening trials conducted in Norway, Italy, the US, and UK with inclusion periods in the years 1993 to 2001. The primary analysis of the study was conducted from January 19 to December 30, 2021. Intervention: Invitation to endoscopic screening. Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were CRC incidence and mortality. Using pooled 15-year follow-up data, colonoscopy screening effectiveness was estimate

• Skjevling, Linn; Hanssen, Hege Marie; Valle, Per Christian; Goll, Rasmus; Juul, Frederik Emil & Arlov, Øystein [Vis alle 7 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Colonic distribution of FMT by different enema procedures compared to colonoscopy – proof of concept study using contrast fluid. BMC Gastroenterology. 23. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02979-x. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Background Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has become an important treatment method in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections and is under investigation as a treatment for several other diseases. FMT’s mechanism of action is assumed to be through alterations of the colon microbiota. FMT can be delivered by several methods, but few studies have directly compared how FMT is distributed in the colon by different methods. Specifically, the proximal distribution of FMT delivered by enema is unknown.<p> <p>Methods In eight participants, we administered contrast fluid (CF) with viscosity similar to an FMT in a crossover study design. First, CF was administered by colonoscopy, followed by an abdominal X-ray to visualize the CF distribution. Next, after four to eight weeks, participants were given CF, but as an enema, followed by a positioning procedure. X-rays were obtained before (enema ÷) and after (enema +) the positioning procedure. <p>Conclusion Proportion of participants with CF in cecum were 100% after colonoscopy, 50% after enema+and 38% after enema ÷. In the transverse colon, proportions were 100% (colonoscopy), 88% (enema +) and 63% (enema ÷). There were no adverse events. <p>Interpretation This study shows proof of concept for the distribution of FMT to proximal colon when delivered by enema. A positioning procedure after the enema slightly improves the proximal distribution. However, colonoscopy is the only method that ensures delivery to the cecum. Studies are needed to see if FMT colon distribution correlates with treatment effectiveness. <p>Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05121285) (16/11/2021).

• Juul, Frederik Emil; Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad; Nesbakken, Philip Eugen; Løberg, Magnus; Wieszczy, Paulina & Cubiella, Joaquín [Vis alle 19 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2022). Rates of repeated colonoscopies to clean the colon from low-risk and high-risk adenomas: Results from the EPoS trials. Gut. ISSN 0017-5749. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327696. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Objective High-quality colonoscopy (adequate bowel preparation, whole-colon visualisation and removal of all neoplastic polyps) is a prerequisite to start polyp surveillance, and is ideally achieved in one colonoscopy. In a large multinational polyp surveillance trial, we aimed to investigate clinical practice variation in number of colonoscopies needed to enrol patients with low-risk and high-risk adenomas in polyp surveillance. Design We retrieved data of all patients with low-risk adenomas (one or two tubular adenomas <10 mm with low-grade dysplasia) and high-risk adenomas (3–10 adenomas, ≥1 adenoma ≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia or villous components) in the European Polyp Surveillance trials fulfilling certain logistic and methodologic criteria. We analysed variations in number of colonoscopies needed to achieve high-quality colonoscopy and enter polyp surveillance by endoscopy centre, and by endoscopists who enrolled ≥30 patients. Results The study comprised 15 581 patients from 38 endoscopy centres in five European countries; 6794 patients had low-risk and 8787 had high-risk adenomas. 961 patients (6.2%, 95% CI 5.8% to 6.6%) underwent two or more colonoscopies before surveillance began; 101 (1.5%, 95% CI 1.2% to 1.8%) in the low-risk group and 860 (9.8%, 95% CI 9.2% to 10.4%) in the high-risk group. Main reasons were poor bowel preparation (21.3%) or incomplete colonoscopy/polypectomy (14.4%) or planned second procedure (27.8%). Need of repeat colonoscopy varied between study centres ranging from 0% to 11.8% in low-risk adenoma patients and from 0% to 63.9% in high-risk adenoma patients. On the second colonoscopy, the two most common reasons for a repeat (third) colonoscopy were piecemeal resection (26.5%) and unspecified reason (23.9%). Conclusion There is considerable practice variation in the number of colonoscopies performed to achieve complete polyp removal, indicating need for targeted quality improvement to reduce patient burden. Trial registration number NCT02319928.

• Juul, Frederik Emil; Cross, Amanda J.; Schoen, Robert E.; Senore, Carlo; Pinsky, Paul & Miller, Eric [Vis alle 17 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2022). 15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality : A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials. Annals of Internal Medicine. ISSN 0003-4819. 175(11), s. 1525–1533. doi: 10.7326/M22-0835. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Background: The effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) by sex and age in randomized trials is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the 15-year effect of sigmoidoscopy screening on CRC incidence and mortality. Design: Pooled analysis of 4 large-scale randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening. Setting: Norway, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy. Participants: Women and men aged 55 to 64 years at enrollment. Intervention: Sigmoidoscopy screening. Measurements: Primary end points were cumulative incidence rate ratio (IRR) and mortality rate ratio (MRR) and rate differences after 15 years of follow-up comparing screening versus usual care in intention-to-treat analyses. Stratified analyses were done by sex, cancer site, and age at screening. Results: Analyses comprised 274 952 persons (50.7% women), 137 493 in the screening and 137 459 in the usual care group. Screening attendance was 58% to 84%. After 15 years, the rate difference for CRC incidence was 0.51 cases (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63 cases) per 100 persons and the IRR was 0.79 (CI, 0.75 to 0.83). The rate difference for CRC mortality was 0.13 deaths (CI, 0.07 to 0.19 deaths) per 100 persons, and the MRR was 0.80 (CI, 0.72 to 0.88). Women had less benefit from screening than men for CRC incidence (IRR for women, 0.84 [CI, 0.77 to 0.91]; IRR for men, 0.75 [CI, 0.70 to 0.81]; P = 0.032 for difference) and mortality (MRR for women, 0.91 [CI, 0.77 to 1.17]; MRR for men, 0.73 [CI, 0.64 to 0.83]; P = 0.025 for difference). There was no statistically significant difference in screening effect between persons aged 55 to 59 years and those aged 60 to 64 years. Limitation: Data from the U.K. trial were less granular because of privacy regulations. Conclusion: This pooled analysis of all large randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening demonstrates a significant and sustained effect of sigmoidoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality for 15 years.

• Jodal, Henriette C.; Juul, Frederik Emil; Barua, Ishita; Bretthauer, Michael; Kalager, Mette & Løberg, Magnus [Vis alle 7 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2022). Emergency hospital admissions, prognosis, and population mortality in Norway during the first wave of the Covid-19 epidemic. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. ISSN 1403-4948. 50(6), s. 795–802. doi: 10.1177/14034948221082959. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Background: During the first wave of the Covid-19 epidemic, a national lockdown was established in Norway, and inhabitants were asked to contact healthcare only if absolutely necessary. We investigated hospital admissions and mortality due to non-Covid-19 disease during the lockdown compared to previous years. Methods: We compared the number of emergency admissions and in-hospital fatality for diagnoses probably unaffected (acute myocardial infarction, acute abdominal conditions, cerebrovascular diseases) and affected by the lockdown (infections, injuries) in the South-Eastern Health Region of Norway during weeks 12–22, 2020, compared to the mean of the same period in the years 2017–2019. We also compared population mortality March–May 2020, to the mean of the same period in years 2017–2019. Results: A total of 280,043 emergency admissions were observed; 20,911 admissions probably unaffected, and 30,905 admissions probably affected by the lockdown. Admissions due to diagnoses probably unaffected was reduced by 12% (95% confidence interval (CI) 9–15%), compared to 2017–2019. Admissions for diagnoses probably affected was reduced by 30% (95% CI 28–32%). There was a 34% reduction in in-hospital fatality due to acute myocardial infarction (95% CI 4–56%), 19% due to infections (95% CI 1–33%), and no change for the other diagnoses, compared to 2017–2019. The risk of in-hospital mortality to total mortality was lower for acute myocardial infarction (relative risk 0.85, 95% CI 0.73–0.99) and injuries (relative risk 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.98). Conclusions: Even though fewer patients were admitted to hospital, there was no increase in in-hospital fatality or population mortality, indicating that those who were most in need still received adequate care.

• Juul, Frederik E.; Jodal, Henriette C.; Barua, Ishita; Refsum, Erle; Olsvik, Ørjan & Helsingen, Lise Mørkved [Vis alle 10 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2021). Mortality in Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. ISSN 1403-4948. s. 1–8. doi: 10.1177/14034948211047137. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Background: Norway and Sweden are similar countries in terms of socioeconomics and health care. Norway implemented extensive COVID-19 measures, such as school closures and lockdowns, whereas Sweden did not. Aims: To compare mortality in Norway and Sweden, two similar countries with very different mitigation measures against COVID-19. <p> <p>Methods: Using real-world data from national registries, we compared all-cause and COVID-19-related mortality rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) per 100,000 person-weeks and mortality rate ratios (MRR) comparing the five preceding years (2015–2019) with the pandemic year (2020) in Norway and Sweden. <p> <p>Results: In Norway, all-cause mortality was stable from 2015 to 2019 (mortality rate 14.6–15.1 per 100,000 person-weeks; mean mortality rate 14.9) and was lower in 2020 than from 2015 to 2019 (mortality rate 14.4; MRR 0.97; 95% CI 0.96–0.98). In Sweden, all-cause mortality was stable from 2015 to 2018 (mortality rate 17.0–17.8; mean mortality rate 17.1) and similar to that in 2020 (mortality rate 17.6), but lower in 2019 (mortality rate 16.2). Compared with the years 2015–2019, all-cause mortality in the pandemic year was 3% higher due to the lower rate in 2019 (MRR 1.03; 95% CI 1.02–1.04). Excess mortality was confined to people aged ⩾70 years in Sweden compared with previous years. The COVID-19-associated mortality rates per 100,000 person-weeks during the first wave of the pandemic were 0.3 in Norway and 2.9 in Sweden. <p> <p>Conclusions: All-cause mortality in 2020 decreased in Norway and increased in Sweden compared with previous years. The observed excess deaths in Sweden during the pandemic may, in part, be explained by mortality displacement due to the low all-cause mortality in the previous year.

• Helsingen, Lise Mørkved; Løberg, Magnus; Refsum, Erle; Gjøstein, Dagrun Kyte; Wieszczy, Paulina & Olsvik, Ørjan [Vis alle 16 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2021). Covid-19 transmission in fitness centers in Norway - a randomized trial. BMC Public Health. 21, s. 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12073-0. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Background: Closed fitness centers during the Covid-19 pandemic may negatively impact health and wellbeing. We assessed whether training at fitness centers increases the risk of SARS-CoV-2 virus infection.<p> <p>Methods: In a two-group parallel randomized controlled trial, fitness center members aged 18 to 64 without Covid-19-relevant comorbidities, were randomized to access to training at a fitness center or no-access. Fitness centers applied physical distancing (1 m for floor exercise, 2 m for high-intensity classes) and enhanced hand and surface hygiene. Primary outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 RNA status by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after 14 days, hospital admission after 21 days. The secondary endpoint was SARS-CoV-2 antibody status after 1 month.<p> <p>Results: 3764 individuals were randomized; 1896 to the training arm and 1868 to the no-training arm. In the training arm, 81.8% trained at least once, and 38.5% trained ≥six times. Of 3016 individuals who returned the SARSCoV-2 RNA tests (80.5%), there was one positive test in the training arm, and none in the no-training arm (risk difference 0.053%; 95% CI − 0.050 to 0.156%; p = 0.32). Eleven individuals in the training arm (0.8% of tested) and 27 in the no-training arm (2.4% of tested) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (risk difference − 0.87%; 95%CI − 1.52% to − 0.23%; p = 0.001). No outpatient visits or hospital admissions due to Covid-19 occurred in either arm.<p> <p>Conclusion: Provided good hygiene and physical distancing measures and low population prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was no increased infection risk of SARS-CoV-2 in fitness centers in Oslo, Norway for individuals without Covid-19-relevant comorbidities.

• Juul, Frederik Emil (2020). Legen som pasient. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 140(6), s. 1–2. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0135. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad; Bretthauer, Michael; Skudal, Hilde Kristin; Oines, Mari N. & Wiig, Håvard [Vis alle 16 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2018). Fecal microbiota transplantation for primary Clostridium difficile infection. New England Journal of Medicine. ISSN 0028-4793. 378(26), s. 2535–2537. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1803103. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Bø, Sebastian; Wiig, Håvard; Juul, Frederik Emil; Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad; Johnsen, Peter Holger & Bretthauer, Michael (2025). Tarmflorabehandling mot førstegangsinfeksjon med Clostridioides difficile. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.25.0276. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Bekkelund, Mattis; Juul, Frederik Emil; Sandstad, Olav & Valeur, Jørgen (2025). Bakteriell overdiagnostikk i tynntarm. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 145. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.24.0655. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Skåland, Mari Ims; Tonby, Kristian; Ingebretsen, André; Gammelsrud, Karianne Wiger; Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad & Juul, Frederik Emil (2025). Clostridioides difficile-infeksjon. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 145(7). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.24.0233. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Bretthauer, Michael; Tonby, Kristian; Berdal, Jan-Erik; Hoff, Dag Arne Lihaug & Ofstad, Eirik Hugaas [Vis alle 27 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2024). Fecal microbiota transplant versus Vancomycin for primary Clostridioides difficile infection - a randomized non-inferiority trial. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Cross, Amanda J.; Pinsky, Paul; Senore, Carlo & Løberg, Magnus (2023). 15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality. Annals of Internal Medicine. ISSN 0003-4819. 176(6). doi: 10.7326/L23-0025. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Hov, Johannes Espolin Roksund; Trøseid, Marius; Johnsen, Peter Holger & Valeur, Jørgen (2023). Tarmflora og tarmsykdom - en edruelig formaning. 143(10), s. 849–850. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0121. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2022). Sommerlegen. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 142(10). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0371. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Løvald, Kaja Bråten & Juul, Frederik Emil (2022). #26 - Frederik Emil Juul om tarmflorabehandling. [Radio]. @medisinstudentsnap. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Medisinstudentsnap intervjuer de råeste legene i landet om spennende medisinske tema, lærerike pasienthistorier og sjelsettene opplevelser fra karrieren. Følg oss på Instagram @medisinstudentsnap for quiz og annen medisinsk moro. Dagens gjest er Frederik Emil Juul, doktorgradsstipendiat ved Oslo universitetssykehus i forskningsgruppen Klinisk effektforskning. Stipendiatprosjektet er den kliniske studien COLONIZE, hvor de undersøker om tarmflorabehandling kan brukes som behandling av primærinfeksjoner med bakterien Clostridioides difficile. I tillegg snakker vi om hverdagen som forsker, kunnskapshåndtering, IBS og mye mer! Som alltid får du også noen gode studietips og helseråd mot slutten av episoden. Enjoy! Følg oss på Instagram @medisinstudentsnap

• Juul, Frederik Emil (2022). Skiftarbeid. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 142(3), s. 1–3. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0007. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2022). «Forskning viser at …». Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 142(17). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0649. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2021). Filmlegen. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.21.0061. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2021). Pasient, du lyver! 141(12). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.21.0555. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil & Johnsen, Peter Holger (2020). Norge i forskningsfronten på avføringsbehandling. LVSinfo. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2020). Digitale forelesninger. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0638. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil & Stensrud, Mats Julius (2020). En morbid innhøsting. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0648. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil & Valeur, Jørgen (2019). Tarmflorabehandling. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 139(9), s. 859–859. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0058. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2019). Man må like mennesker. Turleder'n. ISSN 0805-1461. 36(1), s. 14–15. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2019). Byråkratiet i medisinske studier. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 139(5), s. 1–2. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0067. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil & Valeur, Jørgen (2019). Tilsvar til Frøland SS. Fekaltransplantasjon og mikrobiom. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 139(11), s. 1020–1020. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2019). Legene uten pasienter. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0501. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2019). Pasientutvalg representative for virkelig, klinisk praksis :. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 139(9), s. 788–788. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0328. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil & Valeur, Jørgen (2019). Snille bakterier finnes ikke. 139(6), s. 504–505. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0134. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2018). Blind nysgjerrighet. 138(12). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.18.0419. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Garborg, Kjetil Kjeldstad; Bretthauer, Michael; Kalager, Mette; Midtvedt, Tore & Furholm, Siv [Vis alle 17 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2018). Fecal microbiota transplantation versus antibiotics for primary Clostridium difficile infection - a multicenter, randomized proof-of-concept trial. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2018). Lykkelig ensom. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.1076. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Skudal, Hilde Kristin; Øines, Mari Nanna; Wiig, Håvard; Rose, Øystein & Seip, Birgitte Karen Berggreen [Vis alle 14 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2018). Fecal microbiota transplant in primary Clostridium difficile infection - a proof-of-concept trial. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2017). Farlig journaltranskripsjon. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0027. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2017). Unike uniformer. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0239. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2017). Er unge leger overbehandlere? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2016). Like leger lunsjer best? doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0098. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2016). Å være en spirrevipp. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0701. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2016). Blant de store veikryssene. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0370. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2016). Å se seg selv i pasienten. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0979. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2016). Re: Magnesiummangel og protonpumpehemmere. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. 136(20), s. 1703–1703. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0867. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Blomkvist, Andreas Wahl; Juul, Frederik Emil & Schei, Edvin (2016). Å kommunisere som en helbreder. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2016). Indremedisinsk bredde i lommeformat. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Tidsskriftet). ISSN 0029-2001. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0061. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2015). En ambivalent student. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.1085. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2015). Husker du hvordan det var? doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0098. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2015). En hyllest til bøkene. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0635. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil; Samuelsen, Jens-Øyvind & Stensrud, Mats Julius (2015). Sportslig språkforvirring. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0564. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Myren, Sverre & Juul, Frederik Emil (2014). Turnuslege. [Journal]. Æsculap. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Juul, Frederik Emil (2014). Hva liker du å gjøre? doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0866. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i NVA