Morten Magelssen

• Schauber, Stefan; Olsen, Anne Olaug; Werner, Erik Lønnmark & Magelssen, Morten (2024). Inconsistencies in rater-based assessments mainly affect borderline candidates: but using simple heuristics might improve pass-fail decisions. Advances in Health Sciences Education. ISSN 1382-4996. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10328-0.
• Fredheim, Olav Magnus Søndenå; Torvund, Solveig Kristine Kolstad; Thoresen, Lisbeth & Magelssen, Morten (2024). How should respiratory depression and loss of airway patency be handled during initiation of palliative sedation? Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. ISSN 0001-5172. doi: 10.1111/aas.14396.
• Aarseth, Svein; Horn, Morten Andreas; Dahlberg, Jørgen & Magelssen, Morten (2023). Befolkningens kunnskaper og holdninger om beslutninger ved livets slutt. Michael. ISSN 1893-9651. 20(1), s. 11–22. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hertzberg, Cecilie Knagenhjelm; Heggestad, Anne Kari Tolo & Magelssen, Morten (2023). Blurred lines: Ethical challenges related to autonomy in home-based care. Nursing Ethics. ISSN 0969-7330. doi: 10.1177/09697330231215951. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Egeland, Tone; Ruud, Tor K.; Hanevik, Hans Ivar & Magelssen, Morten (2023). A study of the experience of Norwegian IVF physicians in evaluating the parenting capacity of patients. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. ISSN 1472-6483. 47(6), s. 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103368. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Research question: How do Norwegian fertility doctors assess the parenting capacity of applicants, and how do they experience and evaluate the assessment practice? Design: Qualitative interview study with 14 Norwegian fertility doctors. Interviews were analysed with systematic text condensation, a qualitative analysis framework. Results: Norwegian fertility doctors deem parenting capacity assessments of applicants to be straightforward and simple in most cases. Yet, some cases of doubt pose difficulties. Physicians can then draw on resources such as colleagues, physicians from other specialties who know the patient and patient records. All the participating physicians agreed with the principle of parenting capacity assessment for patients seeking fertility treatment. The assessment enabled physicians to refuse patients whom they thought should definitely not have responsibility for children. The physicians' main argument was their own felt responsibility for the future child. Even though assessments could be challenging, the participants all thought of themselves as competent to perform them. Indeed, some thought that delegating the assessments would imply abdicating a responsibility that was properly theirs. Although national guidelines might aid decision-making, the physicians would not want guidelines to curtail the significant discretion that they exercised. Conclusions: Whether societies should assess applicants' capacity for parenthood before fertility treatment is an ethical and political question. Although sometimes a difficult task, Norwegian fertility doctors see it as important, and as something they are competent and suited to undertake.

• Karlsen, Heidi; Magelssen, Morten & Thoresen, Lisbeth (2023). "Det er dårlig gjort å ha møte uten oss det gjelder" Erfaringer fra pårørende som har deltatt i etikkdrøftinger med kommunale etikkomiteer. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning. ISSN 2387-5976. 9(1), s. 1–7. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Brøderud, Linn Benita; Pedersen, Reidar & Magelssen, Morten (2023). Balancing burdens of infection control: Norwegian district medical officers’ ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Health Services Research. ISSN 1472-6963. 23(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09573-7. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Skirbekk, Helge; Magelssen, Morten & Conradsen, Stein (2023). Trust in healthcare before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health. ISSN 1471-2458. 23(1). doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15716-6. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Wikstøl, David; Horn, Morten Andreas; Pedersen, Reidar & Magelssen, Morten (2023). Citizen attitudes to non-treatment decision making: a Norwegian survey. BMC Medical Ethics. ISSN 1472-6939. 24(1). doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00900-5. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Aarseth, Svein; Horn, Morten Andreas; Magelssen, Morten & Supphellen, Magne (2023). Nordmenns holdninger til legalisering av dødshjelp. Michael. ISSN 1893-9651. 23(1), s. 23–32. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• De Panfilis, Ludovica; Magelssen, Morten; Costantini, Massimo; Ghirotto, Luca; Artioli, Giovanna & Turola, Elena [Vis alle 7 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2022). Research, education, ethics consultation: evaluating a Bioethics Unit in an Oncological Research Hospital. BMC Medical Ethics. ISSN 1472-6939. 23(1). doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00863-z. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Isaksson Rø, Karin Elisabet; Magelssen, Morten; Bååthe, Fredrik; Miljeteig, Ingrid & Bringedal, Berit (2022). Duty to treat and perceived risk of contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic: Norwegian physicians’ perspectives and experiences—a questionnaire survey. BMC Health Services Research. ISSN 1472-6963. 22:1509, s. 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08905-3. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Bringedal, Berit; Isaksson Rø, Karin Elisabet; Bååthe, Fredrik; Miljeteig, Ingrid & Magelssen, Morten (2022). Guidelines and clinical priority setting during the COVID-19 pandemic – Norwegian doctors’ experiences. BMC Health Services Research. ISSN 1472-6963. 22(1), s. 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08582-2. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Magelssen, Morten (2023). Livet og døden. Kristne perspektiver på bioetikk. Verbum Akademisk. ISBN 9788254314913.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Perin, Marta; Magelssen, Morten; Ghirotto, Luca & De Panfilis, Ludovica (2023). Evaluating a clinical ethics committee (CEC) implementation process in an oncological research hospital: Protocol for a process evaluation study using normalisation process theory (EvaCEC). BMJ Open. ISSN 2044-6055. 13(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067335. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Magelssen, Morten & Solberg, Carl Tollef (2023). Bør dødshjelp legaliseres i Norge? Fem spor i dødshjelpsdebatten. Intensjon og dobbelteffekt .
• Førde, Reidun; Pedersen, Reidar & Magelssen, Morten (2022). Etiske dilemmaer ved amyotrofisk lateral sklerose og respiratorbehandling. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. 142(16), s. 1372–1373. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0503.
• Oftestad, Eivor Andersen; Hofmann, Bjørn Morten & Magelssen, Morten (2022). Veivalget er gjort, men hvor går veien. Intermedicos. 65(2), s. 10–11.
• Magelssen, Morten; Pahle, Jan Andreas Saxlund; Swensen, Elisabeth & Østborg, Tilde Broch (2022). Etisk berøringsangst i fosterdiagnostikken. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. 142(12), s. 1–4. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0466.
• Magelssen, Morten & Solberg, Carl Tollef (2022). Fem spor i dødshjelpsdebatten. Vis sammendrag

  Er det riktig å ta liv for å lindre lidelse? Når man avslutter behandling så pasienten dør, er det dødshjelp?

Se alle arbeider i Cristin