Siste publikasjoner - Senter for medisinsk etikk

• Paranhos, Flávio R. L; Garrafa, Volnei & Solbakk, Jan Helge (2019). The Theory of Common Morality of Bernard Gert. Revista Brasileira de Bioética.  ISSN 1808-6020.  15(1), s 1- 14
• Hofmann, Bjørn Morten (2019). Informing about mammographic screening: Ethical challenges and suggested solutions. Bioethics.  ISSN 0269-9702. . doi: 10.1111/bioe.12676
• Egeland, Karina M.; Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik; Landers, Matthew; Ruud, Torleif; Drake, Robert E & Bond, Gary R. (2019). Psychometric Properties of a Fidelity Scale for Illness Management and Recovery. Administration and Policy in Mental Health.  ISSN 0894-587X. . doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00992-5
• Hofmann, Bjørn Morten (2019). Progress bias versus status quo bias in the ethics of emerging science and technology. Bioethics.  ISSN 0269-9702.  s 1- 12 . doi: 10.1111/bioe.12622
• Hofmann, Bjørn Morten (2019). Back to Basics: Overdiagnosis Is About Unwarranted Diagnosis. American Journal of Epidemiology.  ISSN 0002-9262.  188(10), s 1812- 1817 . doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz148
• Jimenez, Edlyn B; Virtudazo, Jessa Mae P; Torres, Cristina E & Bernabe, Rosemarie de la Cruz (2019). Availability of post-trial access in clinical trials: a review of clinical trial protocols submitted to the research ethics board of the University of the Philippines Manila. Current Medical Research and Opinion.  ISSN 0300-7995.  35(11), s 1849- 1855 . doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1644851
• Robertsen, Annette; Helseth, Eirik; Laake, Jon Henrik & Førde, Reidun (2019). Neurocritical care physicians' doubt about whether to withdraw life-sustaining treatment the first days after devastating brain injury: An interview study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.  ISSN 1757-7241.  27:81, s 1- 8 . doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0648-9
• Magelssen, Morten; Pedersen, Reidar; Miljeteig, Ingrid; Ervik, Håvard & Førde, Reidun (2019). Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: A national study of clinical ethics committees. Journal of Medical Ethics.  ISSN 0306-6800.  s 1- 5 . doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105190
• Vogt, Henrik; Green, Sara; Ekstrøm, Claus Thorn & Brodersen, John (2019). How precision medicine and screening with big data could increase overdiagnosis. BMJ. British Medical Journal.  ISSN 1756-1833.  366 . doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5270
• Goisauf, Melanie; Martin, Gillian; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Ljøsne, Isabelle Sylvie Budin; Ursin, Lars Øystein; Durnová, Anna; Leitsalu, Liis; Smith, Katharine; Casati, Sara; Lavitrano, Marialuisa; Mascalzoni, Deborah; Boeckhout, Martin & Mayrhofer, Michaela Th. (2019). Data in question: A survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research. PLOS ONE.  ISSN 1932-6203. . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221496 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Magelssen, Morten; Le, Nhat Quang & Supphellen, Magne (2019). Secularity, abortion, assisted dying and the future of conscientious objection: modelling the relationship between attitudes. BMC Medical Ethics.  ISSN 1472-6939.  20 . doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0408-4 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  Background Controversies arise over abortion, assisted dying and conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between attitudes towards these bioethical dilemmas, and secularity and religiosity. Method Data were drawn from a 2017 web-based survey of a representative sample of 1615 Norwegian adults. Latent moderated structural equations modelling was used to develop a model of the relationship between attitudes. Results The resulting model indicates that support for abortion rights is associated with pro-secular attitudes and is a main “driver” for support for assisted dying and opposition to conscientious objection. Conclusions This finding should be regarded as a hypothesis which ought to be tested in other populations. If the relationship is robust and reproduced elsewhere, there are important consequences for CO advocates who would then have an interest in disentangling the debate about CO from abortion; and for health systems who ought to consider carefully how a sound policy on CO can safeguard both patient trust in the services and the moral integrity of professionals. It is suggested that if religiosity wanes and pro-secular and pro-abortion attitudes become more widespread, support for CO might decline, putting into question whether present policies of toleration of conscientious refusals will remain acceptable to the majority.

• Hartman, Laura; Metselaar, Suzanne; Widdershoven, Guy; Molewijk, Bert & Molewijk, Albert Christiaan (2019). Developing a ‘moral compass tool’ based on moral case deliberations: A pragmatic hermeneutic approach to clinical ethics. Bioethics.  ISSN 0269-9702.  s 1- 10 . doi: 10.1111/bioe.12617
• Nortvedt, Per (2019). Needs and closeness?Defending a reasonable partiality in nursing care. Nursing Philosophy.  ISSN 1466-7681.  20(3) . doi: 10.1111/nup.12256
• Ploug, Thomas & Holm, Søren (2019). The right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy.  ISSN 1386-7423.  s 1- 8 . doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09912-8
• Martinsen, Elin Håkonsen; Weimand, Bente & Norvoll, Reidun (2019). Does coercion matter? Supporting young next-of-kin in mental health care. Nursing Ethics.  ISSN 0969-7330. . doi: 10.1177/0969733019871681
• Hsieh, Tzung-Chien; Mensah, Martin A.; Pantel, Jean T.; Aguilar, Dione; Bar, Omri; Bayat, Allan; Becerra-Solano, Luis; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Biskup, Saskia; Borisov, Oleg; Braaten, Øivind; Ciaccio, Claudia; Coutelier, Marie; Cremer, Kirsten; Danyel, Magdalena; Daschkey, Svenja; David Eden, Hilda; Devriendt, Koenraad; Wilson, Sandra; Douzgou, Sofia; Dukic, Dejan; Ehmke, Nadja; Fauth, Christine; Fischer-Zirnsak, Björn; Fleischer, Nicole; Gabriel, Heinz; Graul-Neumann, Luitgard; Gripp, Karen W.; Gurovich, Yaron; Gusina, Asya; Haddad, Nechama; Hajjir, Nurulhuda; Hanani, Yair; Hertzberg, Jakob; Hoertnagel, Konstanze; Howell, Janelle; Ivanovski, Ivan; Kaindl, Angela; Kamphans, Tom; Kamphausen, Susanne; Karimov, Catherine; Kathom, Hadil; Keryan, Anna; Knaus, Alexej; Köhler, Sebastian; Kornak, Uwe; Lavrov, Alexander; Leitheiser, Maximilian; Lyon, Gholson J.; Mangold, Elisabeth; Marín Reina, Purificación; Martinez Carrascal, Antonio; Mitter, Diana; Morlan Herrador, Laura; Nadav, Guy; Nöthen, Markus; Orrico, Alfredo; Ott, Claus-Eric; Park, Kristen; Peterlin, Borut; Pölsler, Laura; Raas-Rothschild, Annick; Randolph, Linda; Revencu, Nicole; Ringmann Fagerberg, Christina; Robinson, Peter Nick; Rosnev, Stanislav; Rudnik, Sabine; Rudolf, Gorazd; Schatz, Ulrich; Schossig, Anna; Schubach, Max; Shanoon, Or; Sheridan, Eamonn; Smirin-Yosef, Pola; Spielmann, Malte; Suk, Eun-Kuyng; Sznajer, Yves; Thiel, Christian T.; Thiel, Gundula; Verloes, Alain; Vrecar, Irena; Wahl, Dagmar; Weber, Ingrid; Winter, Korina; Wisniewska, Marzena; Wollnik, Bernd; Yeung, Ming W.; Zhao, Max; Zhu, Na; Zschocke, Johannes; Mundlos, Stefan; Horn, Denise & Krawitz, Peter M. (2019). PEDIA: prioritization of exome data by image analysis. Genetics in Medicine.  ISSN 1098-3600. . doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0566-2
• Novoa-Heckel, Germán & Bernabe, Rosemarie de la Cruz (2019). A survey in Mexico about ethics dumping in clinical research. BMC Medical Ethics.  ISSN 1472-6939.  20:38, s 1- 11 . doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0378-6
• Dahlberg, Jørgen; Dahl, Vegard; Førde, Reidun & Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Lack of informed consent for surgical procedures by elderly patients with inability to consent: a retrospective chart review from an academic medical center in Norway. Patient Safety in Surgery.  ISSN 1754-9493.  13 . doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0205-5
• Bruun, Henriette; Pedersen, Reidar; Stenager, Elsebeth; Mogensen, Christian Backer & Huniche, Lotte (2019). Implementing ethics reflection groups in hospitals: An action research study evaluating barriers and promotors. BMC Medical Ethics.  ISSN 1472-6939.  20(1) . doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0387-5
• Hartman, L; Widdershoven, Guy; de Vries, Annelou; Wensing-Kruger, Annelijn; Heijer, Martin; Steensma, Thomas & Molewijk, Albert Christiaan (2019). Integrative Clinical Ethics Support in Gender Affirmative Care: Lessons Learned. HEC Forum.  ISSN 0956-2737. . doi: 10.1007/s10730-019-09376-6
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim; Førde, Reidun; Thoresen, Lisbeth; Lillemoen, Lillian & Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Significance of advance care planning in nursing homes: views from patients with cognitive impairment, their next of kin, health personnel, and managers. Clinical Interventions in Aging.  ISSN 1176-9092.  14, s 997- 1005 . doi: 10.2147/CIA.S203298
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim; Thoresen, Lisbeth; Gjerberg, Elisabeth; Lillemoen, Lillian & Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Improved patient participation through advance care planning in nursing homes—A cluster randomized clinical trial. Patient Education and Counseling.  ISSN 0738-3991.  102, s 2183- 2191 . doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.001 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Hofmann, Bjørn Morten (2019). Expanding disease and undermining the ethos of medicine. European Journal of Epidemiology (EJE).  ISSN 0393-2990.  s 613- 619 . doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00496-4
• Stich, Anne Kathrin; Mozygemba, Kati; Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke; Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria; Hofmann, Bjørn Morten; van der Wilt, Gert-Jan & Gerhardus, Ansgar (2019). Methods assessing sociocultural aspects of health technologies: Results of a literature review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.  ISSN 0266-4623.  35(2), s 99- 105 . doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000102
• Bjorå, Ingunn K. Hoel; Jorem, Jacob & Tveito, Marit (2019). Tvangsbehandling av somatisk sykdom ved psykisk lidelse. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening.  ISSN 0029-2001.  139(3), s 274- 276 . doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.18.0553
• Gaasø, Ole Marius; Rø, Karin Isaksson; Bringedal, Berit & Magelssen, Morten (2019). Legers holdninger til aktiv dødshjelp. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening.  ISSN 0029-2001.  139(1), s 1- 7 . doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.18.0391
• Martinsen, Elin Håkonsen; Weimand, Bente; Pedersen, Reidar & Norvoll, Reidun (2019). The silent world of young next of kin in mental healthcare. Nursing Ethics.  ISSN 0969-7330.  26(1), s 212- 223 . doi: 10.1177/0969733017694498
• Haaland Barlaup, Astrid; Landsverk, Åse Marie; Myskja, Bjørn Kåre; Supphellen, Magne & Magelssen, Morten (2019). Acceptable attitudes and the limits of tolerance: Understanding public attitudes to conscientious objection in healthcare. Clinical Ethics.  ISSN 1477-7509.  14(3), s 115- 121 . doi: 10.1177/1477750919851066
• Nicol, Dianne; Eckstein, Lisa; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Borry, Pascal; Burgess, Mike; Burke, Wylie; Chalmers, Don; Cho, Mildred; Dove, Edward S.; Fullerton, Stephanie; Ida, Ryuichi; Kato, Kazuto; Kaye, Jane; Koenig, Barbara; Manson, Spero; McGrail, Kimberlyn; Meslin, Eric M.; O'Doherty, Kieran; Prainsack, Barbara; Shabani, Mahsa; Tabor, Holly; Thorogood, Adrian & de Vries, Jantina (2019). Consent insufficient for data release. Science.  ISSN 0036-8075.  364(6439), s 445- 446 . doi: 10.1126/science.aax0892
• Solbakk, Jan Helge (2019). Poetikk i praksis: Om det tragiske og komiske i medisinen. Filosofisk supplement.  ISSN 0809-8220.  15(1), s 56- 65
• Mascalzoni, Deborah; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Ljøsne, Isabelle Sylvie Budin; Bygrave, Lee Andrew; Bell, Jessica; Dove, Edward S.; Fuchsberger, Christian; Hveem, Kristian; Mayrhofer, Michaela Th.; Meraviglia, Viviana; O'Brien, David R.; Pattaro, Cristian; Pramstaller, Peter P.; Rakic, Vojin; Rossini, Alessandra; Shabani, Mahsa; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.; Tomasi, Marta; Ursin, Lars Øystein; Wjst, Matthias & Kaye, Jane (2019). Are Requirements to Deposit Data in Research Repositories Compatible With the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation?. Annals of Internal Medicine.  ISSN 0003-4819.  170(5), s 332- 334 . doi: 10.7326/M18-2854
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate & Høstmælingen, Njål (2019). Balancing Protection and Free Movement of Personal Data: The New European Union General Data Protection Regulation. Annals of Internal Medicine.  ISSN 0003-4819.  170(5), s 335- 337 . doi: 10.7326/M18-2782
• Kjelsvik, Marianne; Sekse, Ragnhild Johanne Tveit; Moi, Asgjerd Litleré; Aasen, Elin Margrethe; Nortvedt, Per & Gjengedal, Eva (2019). Beyond autonomy and care: Experiences of ambivalent abortion seekers. Nursing Ethics.  ISSN 0969-7330.  26(7-8), s 2135- 2146 . doi: 10.1177/0969733018819128 Vis sammendrag

  Background While being prepared for abortions, some women experience decisional ambivalence during their encounters with health personnel at the hospital. Women’s experiences with these encounters have rarely been examined. Objective The objective of this study was to explore ambivalent abortion-seeking women’s experiences of their encounters with health personnel. Research design The data were collected in individual interviews and analysed with dialogical narrative analyses. Participants and research context Thirteen women (aged 18-36 years), who were uncertain of whether to terminate their pregnancies during the first trimester, were interviewed before and after they made their decisions. The participants were recruited at six Norwegian outpatient clinics. Ethical considerations Approval was granted by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics. Findings The ambivalent pregnant women sought to make autonomous decisions while simultaneously involving their closest confidants and health personnel in the process. The following three types of narratives of women’s experiences with encounters with health personnel were identified: the respected women, the identified women and the abandoned women. Discussion The findings are discussed in terms of the ambivalent pregnant woman’s autonomous responsibility in considering an abortion and how her autonomy can be enabled or impaired during encounters with health personnel. Conclusion and implication Although the women considered themselves autonomous and responsible for their final decisions, they wished health personnel were involved in their situations. The health personnel contributed by enabling or disabling the possibility of decision-making in accordance with the women’s values. The findings indicate that health personnel who care for women considering abortions must be trained in dialogical competence.

• Holm, Søren (2019). Let Us Assume That Gene Editing is Safe — The Role of Safety Arguments in the Gene Editing Debate. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.  ISSN 0963-1801.  28(1), s 100- 111 . doi: 10.1017/S0963180118000439
• Husum, Tonje Lossius; Legernes, Elisa & Pedersen, Reidar (2019). “A plea for recognition” Users’ experience of humiliation during mental health care. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.  ISSN 0160-2527.  62, s 148- 153 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.11.004
• Svantesson, Mia; de Snoo-Trimp, Janine; Ursin, Gøril; De Vet, Henrica CW; Brinchmann, Berit Støre & Molewijk, Albert Christiaan (2019). Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: A Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals' priorities. Journal of Medical Ethics.  ISSN 0306-6800. . doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104745 Vis sammendrag

  Background There is a lack of empirical research regarding the outcomes of such clinical ethics support methods as moral case deliberation (MCD). Empirical research in how healthcare professionals perceive potential outcomes is needed in order to evaluate the value and effectiveness of ethics support; and help to design future outcomes research. The aim was to use the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcome Instrument (Euro-MCD) instrument to examine the importance of various MCD outcomes, according to healthcare professionals, prior to participation. Methods A North European field survey among healthcare professionals drawn from 73 workplaces in a variety of healthcare settings in the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden. The Euro-MCD instrument was used. Results All outcomes regarding the domains of moral reflexivity, moral attitude, emotional support, collaboration, impact at organisational level and concrete results, were perceived as very or quite important by 76%–97% of the 703 respondents. Outcomes regarding collaboration and concrete results were perceived as most important. Outcomes assessed as least important were mostly about moral attitude. ’Better interactions with patient/family’ emerged as a new domain from the qualitative analysis. Dutch respondents perceived most of the outcomes as significantly less important than the Scandinavians, especially regarding emotional support. Furthermore, men, those who were younger, and physician-respondents scored most of the outcomes as statistically significantly less important compared with the other respondents. Conclusions The findings indicate a need for a broad instrument such as the Euro-MCD. Outcomes related to better interactions between professionals and patients must also be included in the future. The empirical findings raise the normative question of whether outcomes that were perceived as less important, such as moral reflexivity and moral attitude outcomes, should still be included. In the future, a combination of empirical findings (practice) and normative reflection (theories) will contribute to the revision of the instrument.

• Schipper, Karen; Landeweer, Elisabeth Geke Marjan & Abma, Tineke (2018). Living with end-stage renal disease: Moral responsibilities of patients. Nursing Ethics.  ISSN 0969-7330.  25(8), s 1017- 1029 . doi: 10.1177/0969733016687154
• Widdershoven, Guy; Molewijk, Albert Christiaan & Metselaar, Suzanne (2018). Peer review and beyond. Towards a dialogical approach of quality of ethics support., In Stuart Finder & Mark Bliton (ed.),  Peer Review, Peer Education and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project..  Springer.  ISBN 978-3-319-90955-4.  Chapter.  s 193 - 203

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Hansson, Kristiane Myckland (2019). Å sørge. En bok om tap, sorg, kraft og håp. Cappelen Damm AS.  ISBN 9788202533281.  272 s.
• Widdershoven, Guy; Molewijk, Albert Christiaan & Metselaar, Suzanne (2018). Peer Review, Peer Education and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project. Springer.  ISBN 978-3-319-90953-0.  228 s.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Pasientmedvirkning gjennom forhåndssamtaler.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler i sykehjem - erfaringer fra et forskningsprosjekt.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler - erfaringer, potensiale og utfordringer.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler - erfaringer, potensiale og utfordringer.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). En god og verdig død gjennom forhåndssamtaler.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler - en måte å bli kjent med pasientens preferanser.
• Jorem, Jacob (2019). Juridiske forhold, I:  Alderspsykiatri.  Aldring og helse.  ISBN 9788280613851.  Kapittel 26.  s 434 - 456
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Etikk ved livets slutt.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim & Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Forhåndssamtaler i sykehjem – bærekraftig for helsetjenesten?.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Should patients with cognitive impairment be involved in advance care planning?.
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2019). Balancing protection and free movement of personal data.
• Hofstad, Tore (2019). Recon - reducing coercion in Norway. Hvordan kan vi redusere bruk av tvang overfor mennesker med alvorlige psykiske lidelser?.
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2019). Ethical and social issues surrounding the balancing of individual vs. community interests in psychiatric genetics.
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2019). AI – Giving medicine an edge and pushing privacy to its edge.
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2019). Trenger vi etiske retningslinjer for kunstig intelligens?.
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2019). Oversikt over pågående initiativer for behandling av helseopplysninger.
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2019). The Legal Regulation of Precision Medicine.
• Ramberg, Bjørn Torgrim; Halvorsen, Marit; Førde, Reidun; Ambur, Ole Herman & Borge, Anne Inger Helmen (2019). Medforfatterskap - et stridens eple. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening.  ISSN 0029-2001.  11 . doi: doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0145
• Hofstad, Tore (2019). QCA & the Robustness range of calibration thresholds: how sensitive are solution terms to changing calibrations?. COMPASSS Working Papers series. Vis sammendrag

  Calibration procedures in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) rely on evaluation of cases, which necessarily entails a subjective element of interpretation. This questions the reliability of the inferences draw. To what extent are tests of sufficiency contingent on the researchers’ choice of calibration? The concept robustness range is introduced to illuminate this question. Robustness range is tentatively defined as the calibration boundary within which solution terms and cases remain the same. Applying this concept in research practice increases transparency and adds to our methodological repertoire.

• Martinsen, Elin Håkonsen; Weimand, Bente & Norvoll, Reidun (2019). Does coercion matter? Supporting young next of kin in mental health care.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Samtykke, samtykkekompetanse og tvang i sykehjem.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Bedre PårørendeSamarbeid - kick off dag.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Forbedringsarbeidet i Bedre PårørendeSamarbeid og om taushetsplikten og dokumentasjon.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Forbedringsarbeidet i Bedre PårørendeSamarbeid.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Forbedringsarbeidet i Bedre PårørendeSamarbeid.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Forbedringsarbeidet i Bedre PårørendeSamarbeid.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). The role of empathy and emotion in ethics teaching.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Bedre PårørendeSamarbeid - kick off dag.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Bedre PårørendeSamarbeid - kick off dag.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtalen. Hva betyr det og hva er innholdet?.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Resultater etter implementering av forhåndssamtaler i sykehjem.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler i sykehjem.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler – hvorfor, hvordan og for hvem?.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler i sykehjem.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim & Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Forhåndssamtaler i sykehjem.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Status for prosjektet og mulig nye prosjekter på SME.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler – hvorfor skal vi ha slike samtaler, hvem er de for og hvordan gjør vi det?.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Tvang, autonomi og samtykkekompetanse.
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2019). Utfordringer med økt tilgjenge­lighet av genomiske data. Bestpractice Onkologi/Hematologi.  ISSN 2245-0440.
• Bratlie, Sigrid; Halvorsen, Kristin; Myskja, Bjørn Kåre; Mellegård, Hilde; Bjorvatn, Cathrine; Frost, Petter; Heiene, Gunnar Harald; Hofmann, Bjørn Morten; Holst-Jensen, Arne; Holst-Larsen, Torolf; Malnes, Raino Sverre; Paus, Benedicte; Sandvig, Bente; Sjøli, Sonja Irene; Skarstein, Birgit; Thorseth, May Britt; Vagstad, Nils; Våge, Dag Inge & Borge, Ole Johan (2019). A novel governance framework for GMO : a tiered, more flexible regulation for GMOs would help to stimulate innovation and public debate. EMBO Reports.  ISSN 1469-221X.  s 1- 4 . doi: 10.15252/embr.201947812
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2019). Deling av data i forskning.
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2019, 15. mars). GDPR-forsker: – Det trengs nye tekniske løsninger.  Dagens Medisin.
• Fjeld, Katrine Gahre; Hove, Lene Hystad; Bargbidi, Mitra; Abrahamsen, Siren & Heggestad, Anne Kari Tolo (2019). Eldre som ikke koopererer-etiske aspekter. Aktuell Nordisk odontologi.  ISSN 1902-3545.
• Unhjem, Jeanette Varpen (2019). Mors stemme. Morgenbladet.  ISSN 0805-3847.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2019). Om prosjektet Bedre PårørendeSamarbeid.
• Sævareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim (2019). Forhåndssamtaler - hvordan gjøre det?.
• Hofmann, Bjørn Morten (2019). Etiske utfordringer i folkehelsearbeidet.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Hvordan skrive en god etikkbok - med utgangspunkt i "Etikk i psykiske helsetjenester".
• Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Bedre PårørendeSamarbeid - presentasjon av prosjektet.
• Bentzen, Heidi Beate (2018). Formålsbestemthet. Om prinsippet og implikasjonene av prinsippet.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Samtykkekompetanse, tvang og etikk.
• Dahlberg, Jørgen & Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Samtykkekompetanse – erfaringer fra somatikk og psykisk helsevern. Presentasjon av et nytt e-læringsprogram.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Etikk, menneskerettigheter, makt og tvang.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Hvordan håndtere etiske dilemma knyttet til samtykkekompetanse og tvang?.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Samtykkekompetanse.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Fag, etikk og jus.
• Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Etiske teorier som redskap for gode beslutninger. Introduksjon til diskursetikk og kasuistikk..
• Pedersen, Reidar (2018). Opplæring og erfaringer med kravet om samtykkekompetanse.
• Hofmann, Bjørn Morten (2018). Å bli sin egen bestefar: Bør vi gjøre alt som er mulig innen moderne reproduksjon – og hvordan skal vi sette grenser (nå som gud er død og naturen redigeres av oss)?.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin